Objectives To assess the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and whether NCDs were treated or not, among hospitalised decontamination workers who moved to radio-contaminated areas after Japan's 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant disaster.
Methods We retrospectively extracted records of decontamination workers admitted to Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital between 1 June 2012 and 31 August 2015, from hospital records. We investigated the incidence of underlying NCDs such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes among the decontamination workers, and their treatment status, in addition to the reasons for their hospital admission.
Results A total of 113 decontamination workers were admitted to the hospital (112 male patients, median age of 54 years (age range: 18–69 years)). In terms of the demographics of underlying NCDs in this population, 57 of 72 hypertensive patients (79.2%), 37 of 45 dyslipidaemic patients (82.2%) and 18 of 27 hyperglycaemic patients (66.7%) had not been treated for their NCDs before admission to the hospital.
Conclusions A high burden of underlying NCDs was found in hospitalised decontamination workers in Fukushima. Managing underlying diseases such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes mellitus is essential among this population.
- OCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE
- PUBLIC HEALTH
- SOCIAL MEDICINE
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Strengths and limitations of this study
Data were only assessed for hospitalised decontamination workers, which may have led to an overestimation of underlying diseases in the general population of decontamination workers because hospitalised patients usually have more underlying diseases.
Our main interest was not to show a negative health impact of decontamination work environment, but to clarify the underlying health status of decontamination workers.
Comparative analysis could not be performed from this study.
This study presents the first investigation of underlying diseases in decontamination workers after the nuclear disaster in Fukushima.
Occupational health is a global health issue.1 The WHO Global Plan of Action on Workers' Health highlights that the health of workers is determined not only by workplace hazards but also by social and individual factors, and access to health services.2 Half of the world's population is engaged in formal or informal employment, and may face certain health risks related to occupation; vulnerable populations such as children, pregnant women, older persons and migrant workers may be more susceptible to these risks.2 It is therefore important to recognise vulnerable populations and take measures to protect all aspects of their health.
Migrant workers are an important vulnerable population because the migratory nature of their work can worsen their health.3 Migrant agricultural workers and miners are likely to be exposed to a wide variety of occupational risks3 ,4 because in addition to workplace hazards, they may have a low socioeconomic status (SES), as measured by their level of education, income and occupation.5 ,6 Lack of social and economic resources, exposure to occupational risk and poor access to health services may exacerbate unhealthy lifestyles, leading to a higher mortality rate due to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in migrant workers.7 ,8 In order to improve the workplace health and safety of migrant workers, it is imperative to pay attention not only to primary prevention of occupational and work-related diseases and injury, but also to their overall health, which is not always related to work, including underlying communicable and NCDs, mental health, health promotion and improvement of their working environment.1 ,2 However, there is little information available on the health of migrant workers as the migratory nature of their employment makes proper investigation difficult.
Decontamination workers are a type of migrant workers who moved to the radio-contaminated areas of the Fukushima Prefecture after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) disaster, which followed a mega-earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011.9 ,10 These workers are essentially a type of Japanese temporary employees in construction and manufacturing, who constantly migrate across Japan to find new jobs.11 The number of decontamination workers in Fukushima Prefecture was ∼30 000 in 2015,12 and a considerable proportion of these workers are hired from other parts of Japan, due to a severe shortage of workers in Fukushima. Decontamination work is carried out in contaminated areas with the goal of minimising the level of external radiation to the general public.9 The work is generally carried out under the following working conditions: 8 hours of work per day, 5 days a week, with a 1-hour break per day. Workers are required to wear long-sleeved shirts, long pants and paper masks to prevent external or internal radio contamination.13 To assess excessive ionising radiation exposure dose among decontamination workers, dosimeters and the whole-body counter check-ups are adopted for external and internal exposures, respectively. The accumulated annual doses of the radiation exposure have been regularly surveyed, and the reported mean dose distribution of decontamination workers in the other studies was 0.6 mSv (max dose distribution 7.8 mSv) in 2015.12 ,14 ,15 In addition to the risk of radiation exposure,12 ,14 ,16 ,17 decontamination workers may face various other health risks such as developing NCDs, infection and injury. We previously reported a case of poor control of underlying disease and eventual death of a decontamination worker from sepsis, following infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae,13 highlighting the need for further understanding the incidence of NCDs such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes mellitus in this population.13 To date, there is limited research addressing these points.
Minamisoma City, located 13–38 km from Fukushima Daiichi NPP, has seen a large influx of decontamination workers since 2012 (figure 1). The Minamisoma municipal government has hosted decontamination work in areas located 20–30 km from the NPP, while the Japanese central government has hosted work within the 20 km radius from the NPP.15 The large proportion of decontamination workers living in Minamisoma City, including those working within the 20 km radius from the NPP, may affect public health in that area. Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital (MMGH), located 23 km from Fukushima Daiichi NPP, plays an important role as a general hospital in the areas affected by Fukushima nuclear disaster.
The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of NCDs among hospitalised decontamination workers, and whether NCDs were treated or not, in an area of the Fukushima Prefecture affected by the nuclear disaster.
Study population and definition of decontamination workers
To gain a comprehensive picture of the reasons for admission to the hospital and of the underlying health condition of migrant decontamination workers, we used the medical record database at MMGH to extract retrospective data on hospitalised patients who satisfied the following conditions: (1) was hospitalised to MMGH between 1 June 2012 (the initial day of decontamination work in Minamisoma City) and 31 August 2015; (2) had a recorded residential address outside of Soso District, the northern coastal area of Fukushima Prefecture where the hospital is located (figure 1); and (3) was working as a decontamination worker. We defined a patient as a decontamination worker if this information was included in their medical record, or if the company of their employment, as evident from medical insurance certificates, was one that regularly hired decontamination workers.
From the medical records of the hospitalised decontamination workers, we extracted data on sex, age, residential address, diagnosis on admission, details of whether the condition leading to admission to the hospital had developed during work or not, presence of any underlying disease, alcohol consumption, smoking, marital status and medical insurance.
We investigated the following outcome measures to assess the health of decontamination workers admitted to the hospital: underlying diseases such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and diabetes, and their treatment status was assessed, to evaluate the prevalence and control of such diseases. In addition, lifestyle-related factors such as tobacco and alcohol consumption were investigated. To evaluate whether diagnoses on admission were influenced by underlying NCDs, we examined each diagnosis and noted whether the patient had developed the disease during work.
To define underlying NCDs, we used the following clinical guidelines for the diagnosis of each disease and information on the patients' use of medication, obtained from medical records: systolic blood pressure of ≥140, diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 or the use of antihypertensive agents for treating hypertension; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of ≥140 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol of ≤40 mg/dL, triglyceride of ≥150 mg/dL or the use of antihyperlipidaemic agents for treating hyperlipidaemia; and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of ≥6.5%, blood glucose level of ≥220 mg/dL or the use of antihyperglycaemic agents for treating diabetes.18–20
To assess lifestyle-related factors, we classified patients based on their consumption of alcohol, into regular alcohol users and drinkers who consumed 40 g or more of ethanol a day, which is defined by the Japanese government as binge alcohol consumption.21 We classified patients based on their smoking status, into non-smokers, current smokers and smokers who smoked 15 cigarettes or more per day.22
We classified patients diagnosed on admission, with conditions caused by external factors, such as fractures and animal-related injuries into an external group, and those diagnosed with conditions affecting the internal organs into an internal group. We used the final diagnosis in cases where the final diagnosis was different from the diagnosis on admission.
We compared the prevalence of NCDs among unmarried and married decontamination workers to assess for any effect of marital status on health among the workers.
As to insurance coverage, although a universal health insurance system is implemented in Japan, if the patient visits a hospital due to industrial accident or traffic accident, other insurance is applied. We directly recorded the status of participant's health insurance.
This study was approved by the MMGH Institutional Review Board (approval number 27–14). Written informed consent was found to be unnecessary as this was a retrospective review of records. All data were anonymised prior to analysis.
Among the 113 hospitalised patients who were engaged in decontamination work (112 male patients, median age of 54 years (age range: 18–69 years)), 98 patients (86.7%) were migrants from outside of Fukushima Prefecture. With respect to the demographics of underlying diseases, 57 (79.2%) of the 72 hypertensive patients (63.7%) were not treated before admission to the hospital. Similarly, among the 45 hyperlipidaemic patients (39.8%), 37 (82.2%) were untreated, and among the 27 hyperglycaemic patients (23.8%), 18 (66.7%) were untreated. The measured median value of systolic blood pressure was 140 mm Hg (value range 92–224 mm Hg). Eighty-three patients (73.5%) regularly consumed alcohol, with 28 (24.8%) drinking 40 g or more of ethanol per day, and 94 (83.1%) were current smokers. The number of patients who were not covered by Japanese health insurance, which in theory is to be provided for all people through the universal healthcare system, was as high as 11 (9.7%). Seventy-seven (68.1%) patients out of the total were unmarried (table 1).
Diagnoses on admission included 21 stroke cases, 19 infection cases, 8 seizure cases and 7 heatstroke cases among the 95 patients (84.1%) in the internal group. In this group, conditions developed during work only for 30 cases (31.6%). On the other hand, the leading cause of admission for the 18 patients (15.9%) in the external group was fracture (11 patients, 61.1%). In this group, the 10 conditions that developed during work included 4 fractures (40.0%), 4 hymenoptera stings (40.0%) and 2 conditions caused by other factors (table 2).
Table 3 shows the prevalence of NCDs among unmarried and married decontamination workers. The rate of untreated hypertension among the unmarried population was significantly higher than that of married population (Fisher's test: p-value 0.002).
This study demonstrates that the proportion of untreated underlying diseases such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes mellitus was 79.2%, 82.2% and 66.7%, respectively, among hospitalised decontamination workers, and that the proportion of decontamination workers admitted to MMGH with diseases affecting the internal organs (internal group) was 95 (84.1%); this number is much higher than the proportion of workers who were admitted due to diseases caused by external factors (external group, 18 patients, 15.9%). Furthermore, in the external group, conditions developed during work for 55.6% of the cases, whereas in the internal group, conditions developed during work for 31.6% of the cases.
In addition to protecting against workplace hazards such as traumatic injury, managing NCDs is essential for maintaining the health of the decontamination workers. In ∼80% of internal group patients, the proportion of diseases that developed during work was low (31.6%), suggesting that underlying conditions among workers may be common. Furthermore, a high proportion of alcohol users (73.5%), smokers (83.1%) and patients with untreated underlying disease was observed in the present study. Since it is known that frequent users of alcohol and tobacco have a higher mortality rate due to NCDs,8 it is highly important to prevent and control underlying diseases in this population. Although all decontamination workers are required to undergo a medical check-up every 6 months,15 the high proportion of workers with untreated diseases noted in this study suggests that this may not be an effective healthcare strategy for these workers. Furthermore, unhealthy lifestyles because of migration may have caused further deterioration of the workers' health; solitary migration to an unfamiliar place, which can lead to loss of social connections and poor dietary habits, may play a role in the deterioration of their health. In this regard, it is notable that the majority of the participants (68.1%) in the study were unmarried. In addition to improvement in working conditions, comprehensive and sustainable health support programmes for migratory populations are needed for managing underlying NCDs.
Decontamination workers may also face the risk of developing diseases caused by external factors such as work-related injuries. The proportion of work-related diagnoses was higher among the external group than among the internal group (55.6% vs 31.6%), suggesting a likelihood of workers being exposed to certain risks associated with decontamination work. This may be a natural finding as traumatic conditions tend to develop during work. In a previous study, immigrant agricultural workers were shown to face the risk of certain kinds of traumatic injuries due to a lack of work experience.23 It may be presumed that the migrant decontamination workers face similar risks. However, in the case of Fukushima, specific health problems such as hymenoptera stings may be related to the abandonment of contaminated areas24 and subsequent expansion of animal habitats. In all, further understanding of the specific risks involved and finding ways to prevent traumatic injuries in decontamination workers are both necessary to improve the workplace health and safety of the workers.
Decontamination work may be associated with low-socioeconomic-background workers, which may carry additional health risks. Low SES is associated with a high risk of developing various underlying chronic diseases,6 ,25 ,26 and our previous case report on a decontamination worker also suggested a possible association between a decontamination worker's low SES and deterioration of his health as a result of underlying disease.13 Among the general population in Japan, it is estimated that only 1% of the people are not covered by Japanese health insurance;27 yet the rate of non-coverage among decontamination workers was ∼10% in this study, which is substantially higher than that among the general population. Non-coverage by Japanese health insurance is higher among low-income households, households under unemployed or unstable employment conditions, and single-mother households.28 We speculate that unstable employment conditions such as day labour, and an unsure salary which is highly liable to be affected by weather due to day, may contribute to socioeconomic disadvantage among this group and be associated with the non-coverage of health insurance among decontamination workers.29 Moreover, the proportion of unmarried decontamination workers was as high as 68.1%, while it was 38.9% in the general population.30 Decontamination workers may occupy a position of disadvantage in Japanese society, and we suggest that future studies are necessary to accurately estimate the socioeconomic background of these workers and evaluate its possible association with their health outcomes.
The present study is the first investigation of underlying diseases in decontamination workers hired following the nuclear disaster in Fukushima. However, this study is limited by three main factors. First, although we had tried to compare the study participants with healthy workers or other hospitalised patients to support our hypothesis that there is a high prevalence of untreated NCDs among the hospitalised workers noted in this study, we were unable to collect this data for analysis. MMGH plays an important role as a general hospital in the area affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster, and it has treated decontamination workers who developed various diseases, allowing us to collect our original data. Unfortunately, data regarding other hospitalised patients (eg, a control population) were not available to this study due to lack of ethics approval to the database. In addition, not all data are computerised, meaning that potential for collection and analysis of data can be limited within the capacity of our hospital. In an attempt to obtain the health check-up results of general decontamination workers, we asked companies employing decontamination workers and Minamisoma local government but finally failed to obtain the data of the result due to lack of their consent. The above factors should be recognised as both limitations to this study, and suggestions for further research. Second, only the decontamination workers admitted to one hospital were studied, and the limited number of the study participants may have caused sampling bias. Third, only the decontamination workers from outside Soso District were included, in order to specifically study migrant workers. This may have led to an overestimation of the true burden of underlying disease in decontamination workers as our results do not reflect the health of all the workers. Further investigation is warranted to examine the health status of all types of decontamination workers.
A high burden of underlying NCDs was found in hospitalised decontamination workers in Fukushima. Managing underlying NCDs such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes mellitus among decontamination workers is essential. Further investigation is necessary to shed light on the health status of decontamination workers in Fukushima, in addition to identifying the effect of long-term radiation exposure on these workers.
The authors would like to thank Mr Shun Ishikawa and Mr Yoshiaki Yokota for teaching us about the working conditions of decontamination workers in Minamisoma city.
Contributors All authors conceptualised and designed the study. TS collected the data. TS, MT, AO, CL, SN and SK interpreted the data. SN made the figures. TS wrote the manuscript, and all the authors contributed to making critical revisions for improving the intellectual content of the manuscript.
Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Minamisoma Municipal General Hospital Institutional Review Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement No additional data are available.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.