Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Perceived barriers to accessing mental health services among black and minority ethnic (BME) communities: a qualitative study in Southeast England
  1. Anjum Memon1,
  2. Katie Taylor1,
  3. Lisa M Mohebati1,
  4. Josefin Sundin1,
  5. Max Cooper1,
  6. Thomas Scanlon2,
  7. Richard de Visser3
  1. 1Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
  2. 2Public Health Directorate, Brighton and Hove City Council, Brighton and Hove, UK
  3. 3School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Anjum Memon; a.memon{at}bsms.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective In most developed countries, substantial disparities exist in access to mental health services for black and minority ethnic (BME) populations. We sought to determine perceived barriers to accessing mental health services among people from these backgrounds to inform the development of effective and culturally acceptable services to improve equity in healthcare.

Design and setting Qualitative study in Southeast England.

Participants 26 adults from BME backgrounds (13 men, 13 women; aged >18 years) were recruited to 2 focus groups. Participants were identified through the registers of the Black and Minority Ethnic Community Partnership centre and by visits to local community gatherings and were invited to take part by community development workers. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes about perceived barriers to accessing mental health services.

Results Participants identified 2 broad themes that influenced access to mental health services. First, personal and environmental factors included inability to recognise and accept mental health problems, positive impact of social networks, reluctance to discuss psychological distress and seek help among men, cultural identity, negative perception of and social stigma against mental health and financial factors. Second, factors affecting the relationship between service user and healthcare provider included the impact of long waiting times for initial assessment, language barriers, poor communication between service users and providers, inadequate recognition or response to mental health needs, imbalance of power and authority between service users and providers, cultural naivety, insensitivity and discrimination towards the needs of BME service users and lack of awareness of different services among service users and providers.

Conclusions People from BME backgrounds require considerable mental health literacy and practical support to raise awareness of mental health conditions and combat stigma. There is a need for improving information about services and access pathways. Healthcare providers need relevant training and support in developing effective communication strategies to deliver individually tailored and culturally sensitive care. Improved engagement with people from BME backgrounds in the development and delivery of culturally appropriate mental health services could facilitate better understanding of mental health conditions and improve access.

  • black and minority ethnic (BME) communities
  • MENTAL HEALTH
  • access to health service
  • qualitative study
  • health service evaluation
  • health needs assessment

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AM conceived and designed the study and developed the questionnaires; AM and KT wrote the first draft of the manuscript; LMM implemented the focus groups; KT, LMM, VC and AM coded and analysed the data; KT and JS contributed to the literature search and prepared the drafts of the manuscript; MC, TS and RdeV contributed to the interpretation of the results and commented on the draft manuscripts. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Selected qualitative data from the BME focus groups could be made available on request.