Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Community preparedness for emergency: a cross-sectional survey of residents in Heilongjiang of China
  1. Weilan Xu1,
  2. Yanhua Hao1,2,
  3. Qunhong Wu1,2,
  4. Ning Ning1,2,
  5. Jia You1,
  6. Chaojie Liu3,
  7. Mingli Jiao1,2,
  8. Lijun Gao1,2,
  9. Zheng Kang1,2,
  10. Libo Liang1,2,
  11. Hong Sun1,2,
  12. Yu Cui1,2,
  13. Ye Li1,2,
  14. Xiaonan Han1,
  15. Xin Fang1,
  16. Xiyan Zhao1,
  17. Man Hu1,
  18. Ding Ding1,
  19. Hao Gao1,
  20. Jun Lu4
  1. 1School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
  2. 2Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, China
  3. 3School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  1. Correspondence to Professor Yanhua Hao; hyhyjw{at}126.com and Professor Qunhong Wu, wuqunhong{at}163.com

Abstract

Objective This article aims to identify factors that shape the knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of community residents in China's Heilongjiang province towards emergency preparedness. Findings of such a study may provide evidence to support the development of effective public risk communication strategies and education campaigns.

Design A cross-sectional household questionnaire survey was conducted in Heilongjiang province in 2014. A stratified cluster sampling strategy was employed to select study participants. The questionnaires were administered using face-to-face interviews. 2800 questionnaires were completed, among which 2686 (95.9%) were considered valid for data analyses. A multivariate logistic regression model was adopted to identify the extent to which the independent variables were associated with emergency preparedness.

Results Fewer than 5% respondents were well prepared for emergency. Over half (52%) of poorly prepared respondents did not know what to do in emergency; women (OR=1.691), higher household income (OR ranging from 1.666 to 2.117), previous experience with emergency (OR=1.552), higher levels of knowledge about emergency (OR=2.192), risk awareness (OR=1.531), self-efficacy (OR=1.796), as well as positive attitudes towards emergency preparedness (OR=2.265) were significant predictors for emergency preparedness. Neither educational attainment nor exposure to awareness-raising entered into the logic regression model as a significant predictor for emergency preparedness.

Conclusions The level of emergency preparedness in Heilongjiang residents is very low, which is linked with poor knowledge and attitudes of the residents towards emergency preparedness. Future emergency awareness campaigns should be more focused and tailored to the needs of intended audience, taking into consideration of their usual source of information and knowledge in relation to emergency.

  • PUBLIC HEALTH

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.