rss

This article has a correction

Please see: BMJ Open 2014;4

BMJ Open 4:e005482 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005482
  • Health services research
    • Research

Variation in charges for 10 common blood tests in California hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis

  1. Julia P Nath1
  1. 1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  2. 2Department of Economics, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Renee Y Hsia; renee.hsia{at}emergency.ucsf.edu
  • Received 14 April 2014
  • Revised 10 June 2014
  • Accepted 3 July 2014
  • Published 14 August 2014

Abstract

Objectives To determine the variation in charges for 10 common blood tests across California hospitals in 2011, and to analyse the hospital and market-level factors that may explain any observed variation.

Design, setting and participants We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the degree of charge variation between hospitals for 10 common blood tests using charge data reported by all non-federal California hospitals to the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development in 2011.

Outcome measures Charges for 10 common blood tests at California hospitals during 2011.

Results We found that charges for blood tests varied significantly between California hospitals. For example, charges for a lipid panel ranged from US$10 to US$10 169, a thousand-fold difference. Although government hospitals and teaching hospitals were found to charge significantly less than their counterparts for many blood tests, few other hospital characteristics and no market-level predictors significantly predicted charges for blood tests. Our models explained, at most, 21% of the variation between hospitals in charges for the blood test in question.

Conclusions These findings demonstrate the seemingly arbitrary nature of the charge setting process, making it difficult for patients to act as true consumers in this era of ‘consumer-directed healthcare.’

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Responses to this article

blog comments powered by Disqus