Article info
PDFMedical publishing and peer review
Research
Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature
- Correspondence to Dr Serina Stretton; serina.stretton{at}EnvisionPharmaGroup.com
Citation
Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature
Publication history
- Received January 2, 2014
- Revised June 19, 2014
- Accepted June 23, 2014
- First published July 14, 2014.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2017
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/