You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 4, Issue 5
  • General practitioners’ use of absolute risk versus individual risk factors in cardiovascular disease prevention: an experimental study

Article info

Article menu
XML
Cardiovascular medicine
Research
General practitioners’ use of absolute risk versus individual risk factors in cardiovascular disease prevention: an experimental study

Authors

  • Jesse Jansen Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Carissa Bonner Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Shannon McKinn Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Les Irwig Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Paul Glasziou Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaCentre for Research in Evidence Based Practice Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Jenny Doust Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaCentre for Research in Evidence Based Practice Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Armando Teixeira-Pinto Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Andrew Hayen School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Robin Turner Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Kirsten McCaffery Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jesse Jansen; jesse.jansen{at}sydney.edu.au
View Full Text

Citation

Jansen J, Bonner C, McKinn S, et al
General practitioners’ use of absolute risk versus individual risk factors in cardiovascular disease prevention: an experimental study
BMJ Open 2014;4:e004812. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004812

Publication history

  • Received January 8, 2014
  • Revised April 14, 2014
  • Accepted April 22, 2014
  • First published May 15, 2014.
Online issue publication 
August 02, 2019
Previous versions
Review history

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/