rss
BMJ Open 4:e004600 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004600
  • Infectious diseases
    • Research

Investments in respiratory infectious disease research 1997–2010: a systematic analysis of UK funding

  1. Rifat Atun4,5
  1. 1Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
  2. 2London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  3. 3Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK
  4. 4Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  5. 5Imperial College Business School and the Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Michael G Head; m.head{at}ucl.ac.uk or michael.g.head{at}gmail.com
  • Received 2 December 2013
  • Revised 21 February 2014
  • Accepted 26 February 2014
  • Published 26 March 2014

Abstract

Objectives Respiratory infections are responsible for a large global burden of disease. We assessed the public and philanthropic investments awarded to UK institutions for respiratory infectious disease research to identify areas of underinvestment. We aimed to identify projects and categorise them by pathogen, disease and position along the research and development value chain.

Setting The UK.

Participants Institutions that host and carry out infectious disease research.

Primary and secondary outcome measures The total amount spent and number of studies with a focus on several different respiratory pathogens or diseases, and to correlate these against the global burden of disease; also the total amount spent and number of studies relating to the type of science, the predominant funder in each category and the mean and median award size.

Results We identified 6165 infectious disease studies with a total investment of £2·6 billion. Respiratory research received £419 million (16.1%) across 1192 (19.3%) studies. The Wellcome Trust provided greatest investment (£135.2 million; 32.3%). Tuberculosis received £155 million (37.1%), influenza £80 million (19.1%) and pneumonia £27.8 million (6.6%). Despite high burden, there was relatively little investment in vaccine-preventable diseases including diphtheria (£0.1 million, 0.03%), measles (£5.0 million, 1.2%) and drug-resistant tuberculosis. There were 802 preclinical studies (67.3%) receiving £273 million (65.2%), while implementation research received £81 million (19.3%) across 274 studies (23%). There were comparatively few phase I–IV trials or product development studies. Global health research received £68.3 million (16.3%). Relative investment was strongly correlated with 2010 disease burden.

Conclusions The UK predominantly funds preclinical science. Tuberculosis is the most studied respiratory disease. The high global burden of pneumonia-related disease warrants greater investment than it has historically received. Other priority areas include antimicrobial resistance (particularly within tuberculosis), economics and proactive investments for emerging infectious threats.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

blog comments powered by Disqus