Article Text


Prediabetes, elevated iron and all-cause mortality: a cohort study
  1. Arch G Mainous III1,2,
  2. Rebecca J Tanner1,
  3. Thomas D Coates3,
  4. Richard Baker4
  1. 1Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  2. 2Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  3. 3Department of Pediatrics and Pathology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
  4. 4Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Arch G Mainous III; arch.mainous{at}


Objectives Data have indicated low to non-existent increased mortality risk for individuals with prediabetes, but it is unclear if the risk is increased when the patient has elevated iron markers. Our purpose was to examine the mortality risk among adults with prediabetes in the context of coexisting elevated transferrin saturation (TS) or serum ferritin.

Setting Data collected by the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988–1994 (NHANES III) in the USA and by the National Center for Health Statistics for the National Death Index from 1988 to 2006.

Participants Individuals age 40 and older who participated in the NHANES and provided a blood sample.

Primary outcome variable Mortality was measured as all-cause mortality.

Results Adjusted analyses show that prediabetes has a small increased mortality risk (HR=1.04; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.08). Persons who had prediabetes and elevated serum ferritin had an increased HR for death (HR=1.14; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.24) compared with those who had normal ferritin and normal glucose. Among persons with prediabetes who had elevated TS, they had an increased mortality risk (HR=1.88; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.30) compared with those with normal TS levels and normal glucose.

Conclusions The mortality risk of prediabetes is low. However, among individuals who have coexisting elevated iron markers, particularly TS, the risk rises substantially.

Statistics from

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • This study utilises a nationally representative population-based cohort that allows generalisation of results to the non-institutionalised civilian population of the USA.

  • Mortality was left-censored to control for the potential misclassification of people who were very ill at baseline.

  • Biomarkers for elevated iron and prediabetes were available only at baseline.

  • We were able to only observe individuals for 12 years, which may be insufficient to adequately see an effect on mortality for prediabetes.


Prediabetes is defined by blood glucose concentrations that are higher than normal, but lower than established thresholds for diabetes.1 Prediabetes is a high-risk state for the development of not only diabetes, but also associated complications. Recent data have shown that in developed countries such as the USA and the UK more than a third of adults have prediabetes but the vast majority of these do not realise it.24

Several studies have shown that prediabetes is a mortality risk.5 ,6 On the other hand, other studies have found that prediabetes is not a mortality risk.7–10 Still other studies showed that the relationship was not very robust and was dependent on the measure of prediabetes.11

Three different meta-analyses of observational studies have concluded that elevated iron indices like serum ferritin and transferrin saturation (TS) are strongly associated with increased risk for developing diabetes.12–14 Some evidence exists to indicate that pancreatic β cells are killed in the presence of iron.15 In addition to increased risk of diabetes, elevated TS or elevated ferritin is associated with increased mortality in the general population.16–22 Further, recent evidence suggests that among patients with diabetes, mortality risk increases in the presence of elevated ferritin or elevated TS.23 ,24 We therefore hypothesise that the mortality risk of individuals with prediabetes will be increased in the presence of elevated iron markers.

Considering that only about 10% of the US population with prediabetes realise that they have prediabetes, a better understanding of the potential mortality risk is warranted. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between prediabetes, elevated serum ferritin, elevated TS and mortality in a large, nationally representative cohort.


We conducted longitudinal analyses of the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994 (NHANES III) linked to mortality data collected through the National Death Index. Mortality data were available through 31 December 2006. The NHANES III survey provides population estimates of the USA and was conducted from October 1988 through October 1994.

The NHANES III used complex, multistage, stratified, clustered samples of civilian, non-institutionalised population and is designed and conducted for the purpose of making health-related prevalence estimates that are nationally generalisable. To make accurate population estimates, analysis of the NHANES requires the use of weight and design variables that account for this complex design. The use of sampling weights is necessary to account for differences in probability of selection for each participant and also accounts for non-coverage and non-response.25 The NHANES III oversampled different groups, including older individuals, African-Americans and Mexican-Americans. The application of sampling weights allows us to conduct analyses on the individuals who were sampled in the NHANES and extrapolate those results to the population at large. According to the technical reports provided by the National Center for Health Statistics, without the use of sampling weights, misinterpretation of population estimates based on NHANES III is likely. This strategy of basing the analyses on population estimates is a characteristic that makes the NHANES different from many other cohort designs that do not use weighted population estimates, and provides national generalisability.

Of the 39 695 individuals eligible to participate, a total of 30 818 persons of all ages were examined in their homes or in mobile examination centres which visited 89 communities across the USA (a participation rate of 77.6%). The health examination included collection of blood and urine specimens for the conduct of various laboratory analyses.

The NHANES III data merged with the National Death Index are a prospective cohort study that passively followed up on the participants in the NHANES III. The linked mortality file uses a probabilistic matching method.26 The National Death Index involves searching national databases containing information about mortality and causes of death. Mortality status was ascertained by computerised matching to national databases and evaluation of the resulting matches. Persons not found to be deceased were assumed alive for analytic purposes.

The NHANES III is pre-existing de-identified public use data which do not need specific approval from the National Center for Health Statistics.

We limited our study to individuals 40 years old and older at baseline, the time of their NHANES III interview. All analyses were based on the population estimates generated by applying variables accounting for the design and sampling methodology of the NHANES. The results presented here are generalisable to the non-institutionalised civilian population of the USA aged 40 and older from 1998 to 1994.

Previously diagnosed diabetes

The NHANES III assessed participants for diagnosed diabetes using the questions, “Have you ever been told by a doctor that you have diabetes or sugar diabetes?”, “Were you pregnant when you were told that you had diabetes?” and “Other than during pregnancy, has a doctor ever told you that you have diabetes or sugar diabetes?” We defined participants as having diagnosed diabetes if they answered ‘yes’ to ever having been told they had diabetes, excluding pregnancy. Individuals with previously diagnosed diabetes were removed from the analysis. We also removed individuals with a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6.5% or greater, to account for undiagnosed diabetes.

Normoglycaemia and prediabetes

We defined normoglycaemia as an HbA1c level between 4.0% and 5.6% (20–38 mmol/mol). To control for any potential effect of low HbA1c, we also removed individuals with an HbA1c below 4.0% (20 mmol/mol), a level associated with increased all-cause mortality in adults without diabetes.27

We defined prediabetes among individuals without previously diagnosed diabetes using HbA1c ranges as specified by the American Diabetes Association, 5.7–6.4% (39–46 mmol/mol).1 This range has been shown in a meta-analysis to be predictive of progression to diabetes.19 We excluded individuals with previously diagnosed diabetes because the current glycaemic status of those patients may simply represent diabetes control. Prediabetes status was missing for 1637 of the NHANES respondents over the age of 40.

Transferrin saturation

Serum iron and total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) were measured in serum, and calculated by dividing serum iron by TIBC and multiplying by 100. For the analyses, elevated TS was categorised as TS >50%. Individuals with TS below 25% were removed from the analysis, as low TS has been linked to increased risk of mortality.23 Despite the lack of universal agreement on the upper and lower limits of normal TS, these cut points have been used in several studies evaluating diabetes, TS and mortality.23 ,28 Data were missing for TS level for 536 of the NHANES respondents over the age of 40.

Serum ferritin

Serum ferritin was used as a measure of body iron stores and was measured using the QuantImune Ferritin IRMA kit. Serum ferritin was categorised for the analyses as elevated if it was >674.1 pmol/L (300 ng/mL) for males and >449.4 pmol/L (200 ng/mL) for females.29 Individuals with serum ferritin below 56.175 pmol/L (25 ng/mL) were removed from the analysis, as low ferritin has been linked to an increased risk of mortality.23 Data were missing for serum ferritin level for 539 of the NHANES respondents over the age of 40.


Mortality was measured as all-cause mortality. Mortality status was ascertained solely by computerised matching to national databases and evaluation of the resulting matches. All living survey participants examined in this study had been observed for 146 months, and our survival analysis was carried out to 31 December 2006.


Covariates used in our analyses included: age at baseline in the NHANES III, gender, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic Caucasian, non-Hispanic African-American, Mexican-American and other), health insurance status, obesity (body mass index computed in the examination of >30), previous diagnosis of a heart attack, previous diagnosis of a stroke, previous diagnosis of hypertension, previous diagnosis of hypercholesterolaemia, previous diagnosis of cancer, family history of diabetes, family history of myocardial infarction before age 50 and current smoking status. Respondents were considered non-smokers if they reported smoking less than 100 cigarettes in their life or if they had smoked more than 100 cigarettes and were not currently smoking.

In the analysis of serum ferritin, we also controlled for C reactive protein. Ferritin is an acute phase reactant as well as an indicator of iron stores and as such may indicate inflammation. Consequently, we controlled for inflammation by adjusting for C reactive protein. C reactive protein was considered elevated at levels above 3.0 mg/L.30


In an effort to control for potential misclassification of persons who were very ill at baseline thereby affecting mortality risk of prediabetes, we left-censored the analysis to exclude any mortality events that occurred in the first 3 years following the individuals examination for the first 3 years of the cohort. Because of the complex sampling design of the survey, we performed statistical analyses using the statistical software package SUDAAN (Research Triangle Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA), as recommended by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Using SAS (Cary, North Carolina, USA), we computed Kaplan-Meier plots to show graphically the unadjusted relationship between all-cause mortality and prediabetes.

We followed the NCHS recommendations for assessing the reliability of estimates in the context of a limited sample size. If the SE of an estimate was greater than 30% of an estimate it would be considered unreliable. All estimates met the criteria for reliability.

To accomplish our goals of examining a possible synergistic effect of having elevated iron with prediabetes, we classified the population into four groups based on prediabetes or normoglycaemia and normal or elevated TS. The population was also classified into four groups based on prediabetes or normoglycaemia and normal or elevated serum ferritin.

We performed Cox proportional hazards analyses to measure the associations between all-cause mortality and prediabetes controlling for all of the studied covariates using listwise deletion to account for missing data. In these models, survival time was a continuous variable measured in 1-month increments from the date of the examination.

We also performed adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis with all-cause mortality for prediabetes in the four part variables with TS adjusting for the aforementioned covariates. For the adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis with ferritin, we adjusted for the aforementioned covariates and also C reactive protein.

We evaluated the proportionality of the hazards through examination of the Schoenfeld residuals.


A total of 8003 (unweighted) individuals were over 40 years old and had HbA1c levels between 4.0% and 6.4%, or 80 653 788 individuals nationally. Baseline characteristics for the sample are shown in table 1. Table 1 indicates that 23.2% of the weighted sample had prediabetes, 15.6% of the sample exhibited elevated serum ferritin, and 3.3% had elevated TS.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the sample

Of the respondents that had prediabetes, 38.8% died within 12 years (723 702 died; 11 431 597 survived), compared with 23.4% of respondents with normal HbA1c levels (14 527 028 died; 47 458 061 survived). Among individuals with normal TS and normoglycaemia, 23.1% died (10 724 279 died; 35 649 283 survived), compared with 23.7% of those with elevated TS and normoglycaemia (412 237 died; 1 327 253 survived), 37.5% of those with normal TS and prediabetes (5 137 131 died; 8 572 762 survived), and 44.7% of those with elevated TS and prediabetes (126 633 died; 156 790 survived). Among individuals with normal ferritin and normoglycaemia, 24.3% died (10 967 486 died; 34 132 718 survived), compared with 38.8% of those with normal ferritin and prediabetes (5 465 483 died; 8 614 683 survived), 29.2% of those with elevated ferritin and normoglycaemia (2 333 436 died; 5 662 576 survived), and 38.8% of those with elevated ferritin and prediabetes (1 150 647 died; 1 818 565 survived).

Table 2 shows the results the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model for prediabetes. Table 2 indicates prediabetes alone has a small increased mortality risk. The Kaplan-Meier curve of the survival and prediabetes over the length of the time under observation is shown in figure 1.

Table 2

Adjusted HRs from Cox regression for mortality risk of individuals with prediabetes

Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curve of survival among individuals with prediabetes or normal glycaemic levels. Embedded Image Normoglycaemia; Embedded Image prediabetes.

Table 3 presents results of the analyses combining prediabetes with iron markers. In models that examined the impact of a prediabetes state combined with markers of low iron, the HRs were similar to that of prediabetes alone. However, when combined with prediabetes, there was an increased mortality risk among individuals with TS >50, as well as with individuals who had increased ferritin. The risk was most increased when individuals had elevated ferritin and elevated TS together. Figure 2 represents the relationship of survival of the four groups over the 12 years under observation. Individuals with prediabetes in the presence of elevated iron have lower survival probabilities than other groups. An examination of the Schoenfeld residuals suggested proportionality of hazards and appropriateness of the statistical model for these analyses.

Table 3

Adjusted HRs from Cox regression for mortality risk of individuals with prediabetes and iron markers

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curve of survival among individuals with prediabetes and elevated transferrin saturation. Embedded Image Normoglycaemia and normal transferrin saturation; Embedded Imagenormoglycaemia and elevated transferrin saturation; Embedded Image prediabetes and normal transferrin saturation; Embedded Image prediabetes and elevated transferrin saturation.


The results of this study in a nationally representative cohort that followed individuals for 12 years confirm that the mortality risk of prediabetes is probably low. This is not unexpected based on the mixed results from previous studies, several of which found either no future mortality risk or risk that was not robust across measures. However, we found that the presence of TS and serum ferritin is associated with increased mortality risk of individuals with prediabetes. Among individuals with normal iron levels, those with prediabetes had low mortality risk levels similar to the adjusted risk of prediabetes alone. On the other hand, in adjusted survival analyses, individuals with prediabetes who also had elevated TS had substantially increased mortality risk. These findings extend previous work on iron markers and diabetes to the previously uninvestigated area of prediabetes.

These results suggest that additional stratification of individuals with prediabetes on the basis of iron markers would be useful to identify those with higher risk and who might benefit from iron-lowering therapies. Previous data have indicated that elevated iron markers are associated with the development of diabetes and that among individuals with diabetes the co-occurrence of elevated TS increases those patients’ mortality risk. Early identification of individuals with both conditions (prediabetes, elevated iron) may help in slowing the development of diabetes as well as decreasing mortality risk. It is important for early identification of these individuals because much like individuals with prediabetes, the vast majority of individuals with elevated iron do not know it.31 These individuals need to be identified to mitigate the increased risk posed by elevated iron in combination with prediabetes. Such individuals would be targets for intensive interventions to reduce risk, including typical lifestyle interventions shown to help avoid the onset of diabetes in people at high risk.32 Although more research is needed into the ability of interventions on iron in prediabetes to affect development of diabetes and mortality risk, some data suggest that reduction of TS improves HbA1c and glucose control.33

These associations of TS and ferritin with mortality in the context of prediabetes are not surprising, especially if elevations of these parameters are interpreted in light of current understanding of iron toxicity.34 Iron, whether absorbed as iron salts or in dietary haeme, is processed by enterocytes and released into the plasma where it is transported in a non-reactive state bound to transferrin. Iron that is bound to transferrin is in the Fe+3 state and is not reactive and, therefore, not toxic. However, when TS is above 40–50%, free iron or so-called non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI) is released into the plasma as the buffering ability of transferrin is exceeded.35 Labile plasma iron (LPI) is a highly reactive subspecies of NTBI that interacts with hydrogen peroxide through Fenton chemistry to form the extremely powerful oxidants, hydroxyl radical and singlet oxygen. These are the free radicals that ultimately directly damage protein and DNA. Perhaps more importantly, NTBI/LPI species are able to enter cells via ion channels. These channels, unlike the transferrin receptor, are not regulated so this reactive iron freely enters the cytoplasm of the pancreas, pituitary and heart.

The current results suggest that exposure to excessive free iron is dangerous in the context of prediabetes. Furthermore, elevated ferritin and TS predict poor diabetes control and phlebotomy to reduce iron even over short periods of time improve HbA1c in parallel with changes in TS, even though ferritin is not changed.33 NTBI/LPI reflected by TS is the proximal cause of the toxicity. Several strategies are available to decrease iron, including chelation therapy and phlebotomy. Phlebotomy is an easy, inexpensive and well-tolerated intervention.

Reduction in TS by phlebotomy has been shown to improve measures of diabetic control.33 Furthermore, correction of severe iron overload can significantly improve glucose tolerance.36 Thus, the finding that a baseline measure of high TS as point measure of toxic-free iron plus elevation of ferritin, evidence of elevated cytosolic iron over a longer period of time, predicts increased risk of mortality among individuals with prediabetes supports the premise that toxic-free iron is a health risk.

The normoglycaemic group with elevated iron markers did not show increased mortality risk in comparison to the reference group of normoglycaemic and normal iron marker levels. This may seem inconsistent with other data on the increased mortality risk due to elevated TS by itself. However, there is the potential that the effect of TS on mortality is modified by the presence of other variables.19 ,21 This effect has been shown in the past. Rather than being inconsistent with the TS alone and mortality findings, these new findings enhance our understanding of elevated iron markers and morbidity and mortality and allow us to consider the more complex, but real, situation of patients by considering multiple variables together rather than independently.

This study has several limitations. First, although we have a nationally representative, population-based cohort followed through the National Death Index, the biomarkers are measured only at baseline. There is the possibility that either the hyperglycaemia or elevated iron measures were identified and interventions were implemented to lower these biomarkers. If that were the case and a substantial number of individuals did drop their levels due to interventions thereby decreasing the potential mortality risk, the observed adjusted risk individuals elevated at baseline is even more concerning. Second, we were only able to follow these individuals for 12 years. It is possible that this time frame may have been too short to adequately see an effect for a biomarker like prediabetes. However, we did censor the first 3 years of mortality so that any deaths in that time frame would not be attributed to prediabetes. The model still found a substantial mortality risk for the prediabetes plus iron markers in this length of time. Third, we were unable to evaluate the relationship between being elevated on both TS and serum ferritin with prediabetes on the risk of mortality. We attempted such an analysis but the number of individuals in the group with prediabetes and elevation on both iron markers was small and the population estimates were deemed unreliable.

In conclusion, this study representative of the population of the USA helps to clarify the current evidence on the mortality risk of prediabetes and provides further support for the role of elevated iron markers in health risk. Future screening and intervention programmes for prediabetes may benefit from additional strategies to recognise and treat iron elevations, particularly TS.


View Abstract


  • Contributors AGM was involved in conception, design, analysis and drafting of manuscript. RJT was involved in design, analysis and drafting of manuscript. TDC was involved in conception, design and drafting of manuscript. RB was involved in design and analysis.

  • Funding Funded in part by cooperative agreement 1U01DD000754-01 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Data from this study are publicly available on the Internet through the National Center for Health Statistics.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.