Introduction Whether acupuncture is efficacious for patients with functional dyspepsia is still controversial. So we designed a randomised controlled trial to settle the problem.
Methods and analysis We designed a multicentre, two-arm, sham-controlled clinical trial. 200 participants with functional dyspepsia will be randomly assigned to the true acupuncture (TA) group and sham acupuncture (SA) group in a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the TA group will receive acupuncture at points selected according to syndrome differentiation. Participants in the sham acupuncture group will receive penetrations at sham points. Participants in both groups will receive 20 sessions of electroacupuncture in 4 weeks, five times continuously with a 2 day rest in a week. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients reporting the absence of dyspeptic symptoms at 16 weeks after inclusion. The secondary outcome includes a Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire, the Chinese version of the 36-Item Short Form Survey, the Chinese version of the Nepean dyspepsia index, etc.
Ethics and dissemination The study protocol has been approved by the institutional review boards and ethics committees of the first affiliated hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, the first affiliated hospital of Hunan University of TCM and Chongqing Medical University, respectively (from April to August 2012). The results of this trial will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international congresses.
Trials registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01671670.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Is acupuncture efficacious for patients with functional dyspepsia?
How will the acupuncture effect change over time?
This study will increase the knowledge about the efficacy of acupuncture for functional dyspepsia.
The primary outcome is the proportion of patients reporting the absence of dyspeptic symptoms at 16 weeks after inclusion.
Outcome measurements will be assessed at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks after inclusion.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This trial is the first multicentre randomised controlled trial using an individualised acupuncture protocol to test the efficacy of acupuncture for functional dyspepsia.
The first trial focuses on the changes of acupuncture effect on functional dyspepsia over time.
Blinding the care providers is still not applied in this trial, since it is merely impossible to blind acupuncturists.
Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common gastroduodenal disorder without structural lesions, which is claimed to affect 20–25% of the population in Western countries.1 In Asia, the prevalence of FD is reported to be 5.3% in the adult population of Taiwan,2 while it bothers 24% of the school children in Thailand.3 Overall, the prevalence of FD ranges from 8% to 23% in Asia.4 FD is closely related to low quality of life, psychological disturbances, etc,5 ,6 leading to excess healthcare services and costs as well as low work productivity.7 ,8
Reasonable treatment approaches based on current evidence are a daily proton pump inhibitor in patients with FD with Helicobacter pylori-negative, a tricyclic antidepressant, an antinociceptive agent, a prokinetic agent or some form of complementary and alternative medications.9–13 However, evidence supporting these approaches is still limited.9–13 Acupuncture, as one of the most popular complementary therapies, is widely used for gastrointestinal diseases in China.14 Our previous study showed that acupuncture is effective and efficacious for patients with FD.15 However, in this trial, fixed acupuncture protocols were used, which is not quite the same as conventional acupuncture practice, in which individualised acupuncture protocols are commonly applied. Moreover, we found a trend that the effect of acupuncture seems to last for months, but we are not sure how long the effect will last because of the short follow-up period. Since FD is a chronic disorder with exacerbations and remissions, it is important to find out the answers.16
Therefore, we will conduct another randomised controlled trial aiming at: first, confirming whether individualised acupuncture treatment is efficacious for patients with FD; second, observing and analysing the change of acupuncture effect over time.
Overview of the study design
We designed a multicentre, two-arm, sham-controlled study, in which the interventions will be performed under ideal circumstances. Therefore, this trial will be carried out in academic settings, which were originally planned to be: The first affiliated hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, the first affiliated hospital of Hunan University of TCM and Chongqing Medical University.
If the participants meet the inclusion criteria, the acupuncturists in each centre will send a phone text or an email (including the name, age, gender of a participant) that requires central randomisation, which is managed by a third party (the Brightech Magnsoft Data Services Company). The acupuncturists will receive a text containing the group assignment, randomisation sequence and project number, several minutes after sending out the requirement for randomisation.
Before baseline, participants will be screened in the aforementioned research centres. After the screening process, the patients with FD will be asked if they are willing to participate in this trial; if not, they will be given conventional treatment according to the guidelines,17 and will be assessed using the same outcome measurements through telephone follow-up.
After randomisation, the participants will be either assigned to an acupuncture group or a sham acupuncture group. They will go through a total research period of 25 weeks, including 1 week at baseline, 4 weeks of acupuncture treatment and 20 weeks of the follow-up phase. The included participants will receive 20 sessions of acupuncture treatment in 4 weeks, five times continuously with a 2-day rest in a week. Outcome measurements will be assessed at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks after inclusion, with the outcome assessors blinded to the group assignment.
The study protocol has been approved by local institutional review boards and ethics committees (from April to August 2012). It follows the principles of the CONSORT and STRICTA statements as well as the Declaration of Helsinki (Sixth revision, 2008).
We are planning to recruit patients with FD diagnosed on the basis of the Rome III criteria.18 And we choose to include patients with FD classified with postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), ruling out those classified with epigastric pain syndrome (EPS). According to our previous research, 70% of patients with FD were classified with PDS, which is a larger suffering population than those with EPS. Additionally, to ensure an ideal circumstance for this efficacy trial, we will include only patients with PDS, although it will partially narrow the generality of the results. Doctors responsible for screening patients will be gathered and trained using the ROME III criteria in each centre. Then a pretrial screening will be performed, with all the doctors screening a group of participants. Finally, a comparison of the screening results among different doctors will be made, and homogeneity should be achieved. Details of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the participants are listed in table 1.
After a diagnosis of FD was established, gastrointestinal symptoms and the quality of life will be evaluated to determine the patient's baseline status. Then the participants will go through the randomisation process.
Recruitment strategies and randomisation
We will recruit participants through three methods: first, call the participants who joined our previous study to find out if they are interested in attending this study; second, specific doctors receiving training will screen and recruit participants in outpatient clinics in each centre; third, advertisements and recruitment notices will be placed in newspapers, the local media, health promotion manuals, etc.
If patients are eligible, the doctor will ask if they are interested in participating. If so, the doctor will refer them to a research coordinator, who will introduce the aim and the methods of this study and ask the participants to sign the consent form. Participants who provide consent will be introduced to the outcome assessor for baseline evaluation and then be referred to an acupuncturist to apply for randomisation.
Central randomisation is used in this study. The acupuncturists are trained to apply for randomisation through text messages, online website or telephone application. Qualified acupuncturists will have their cell phone number registered in the randomisation centre (located in Brightech Magnsoft Data Services Company), with permission to send applications for randomisation of participants. Randomisation is automatically performed in a real-time mode by the central computer. Subjects are randomised in blocks of varying size within each site, stratified by age and duration of FD.
Participants will be blinded to group assignment in this trial. We will inform them that there are two types of acupuncture treatment provided for FD in this trial, both of which are used in clinical practice. We will also notify that one of the acupuncture treatments is a traditional style, while the other is a style designed according to the rationale of Western medicine. Acupuncturists (care providers) will not be blinded in this trial, because it is impossible. Acupuncturists could easily guess the group assignment, through recognising the function of the acupuncture points, which we should clearly tell them. So in this trial, we ask the acupuncturists to use the same method of stimulating acupuncture points and sham acupuncture points, in order to control the risk of performance bias.
In the planning phase, we formulated the acupuncture protocol in three steps: first, through a systematic review of published studies, textbooks and ancient literatures, we decided on the syndrome differentiation protocol for acupuncture treatment of FD (excess syndrome and deficiency syndrome), as well as a range of acupuncture points to manage the condition. Second, we held a face-to-face meeting to discuss the protocol and turn it into a standardised approach. Third, we sent out questionnaires to acupuncturists across the country, asking whether this standardised protocol is commonly used in their clinical practice and also asking suggestions for improvement. Fourth, a final version of the protocol was used in the Phase I study, with 10 healthy subjects and 10 participants with FD included, to test the safety, effect size and tolerance of the acupuncture treatment for the condition.
We choose Zusanli (ST36) and Neiguan (PC6) as basic acupuncture points, which will be needled in every participant. ST36 belongs to the stomach meridian according to traditional acupuncture theories, which is believed to be one of the best acupuncture points specifically selected for gastrointestinal diseases. PC6 is frequently used for upper gastrointestinal conditions, such as nausea and vomiting, which are associated with acute myocardial infarction,19 chemotherapy,20 hyperemesis gravidarum,21 etc. Regarding patients with FD manifesting mainly with upper gastrointestinal discomfort, ST36 and PC6 were chosen as the basic points.
Additionally, there are two groups of optional points, which would be alternately selected according to syndrome differentiation. First group: if the participants are differentiated as excess syndrome, Taichong (TR3) and Neiting (ST2) will be selected. Second group: if differentiated as deficiency syndrome, Gongsun (SP4) and Yinlingquan (SP9) will be selected. The excess and deficiency syndromes are defined according to the dyspepsia session in Guidance of clinical research of traditional Chinese medicine published by the State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) in China.22 The excess syndrome mainly refers to excess of liver Qi and stomach fire, while the deficiency syndrome mainly refers to deficiency of spleen and stomach Qi. So TR3 (which belongs to the liver meridian) and ST2 (which belongs to the stomach meridian) are fit for the excess syndrome, whereas SP4 and SP9 (both belong to the spleen meridian) are selected for the deficiency syndrome. Therefore, selection of acupuncture points consists of two basic points and two optional points, which is similar to conventional acupuncture practice.
Each point is a puncture using a filiform needle (25–40 mm in length and 0.25 mm in diameter), and achieving a Deqi sensation (refers to a sensation of numbness, distension or electrical tingling at the needling site which might radiate along the corresponding meridian) is needed. Then an auxiliary needle (13 mm in length and 0.18 mm in diameter) will be a puncture 2 mm lateral to the first needle, to a depth of 2 mm without the arrival of Deqi. Electroacupuncture will be used at every point with one electrode connected to the filiform needle and the other to the auxiliary needle. This method limits electrical stimulation on points, rather than going across the human body surface to cause performance bias. Electrical stimulation will last for 30 min in each acupuncture session. A total of 20 acupuncture sessions will be performed during 4 weeks, once daily for 5 days with a 2-day rest in a week (figure 1).
Sham acupuncture arm
The same sham points as used in our previous study will be adopted in this trial, and details of the location of the points are described elsewhere.23 Participants in the sham control group will also receive the same electrical stimulation and the same duration of treatments as the participants received in the acupuncture group.
The intervention of this trial is the rigorous acupuncture schedule; to ensure the compliance of acupuncturists to the schedule, we ask them to take a pretrial training and an entrance exam for this trial. Only the qualified acupuncturists will be admitted to this trial. The principal investigator (FL)will assign a specific researcher in every centre to check if the acupuncturists follow the treatment protocol and report the compliance every month to the Brightech Magnsoft Data Services Company.
The primary outcome of this study was first targeted through a review of previous studies and then selected based on a consensus from researchers in the territory of functional gastrointestinal disorders, patients with dyspepsia and physicians. The proportion of patients reporting the complete absence of dyspeptic symptoms is considered to be the most important outcome measurement.24 So the participants in this trial will undergo a self-assessment of global relief of the dyspepsia symptoms, with a five-grade scale: absence of dyspeptic symptoms, significantly improved, moderately improved, not changed and deteriorated. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients reporting the absence of dyspeptic symptoms at 16 weeks after inclusion, at which stage the participants are supposed to achieve maximum relief of the dyspeptic symptoms according to our previous study.15
The Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SF-LDQ)25 is a five question instrument for assessing the dyspeptic symptoms. Five symptoms including epigastric pain, postprandial distention, indigestion, heartburn and nausea will be graded for severity on a five-point Likert scale from very mild to very severe: no symptoms (0 point), mild symptoms without influence of regular work (1 point), mild symptoms with influence of regular work (2 points), moderate symptoms (3 points), severe symptoms (4 points) and extremely severe symptoms (5 points). SF-LDQ is a validated and reliable tool to assess the dyspeptic symptoms of patients with FD,25 ,26 with higher scores indicating worse dyspeptic outcomes.
A Chinese version of Nepean dyspepsia index (NDI) will be used in this trial to assess the disease-specific quality of life. This scale was validated and confirmed to be a reliable tool for the Chinese population in our previous study.27 The NDI scale consists of 25 items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 99. Higher scores indicate a poorer quality of life. Each of the items is a five-point Likert scale that scores the severity of symptoms from ‘not at all’ to ‘extremely severe’. Moreover, the 25-item NDI scale measures the quality of life in four domains: interference (13 items), know/control (7 items), eat/drink (3 items) and sleep/disturb (2 items). Finally, a Chinese version of the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) will be used to assess the overall health status of the included participants.
Time points of outcome measurement
We chose the time points of assessments, considering the following aims: first, to capture the key milestones in the management of patients with FD with acupuncture; second, to see how the acupuncture effect changes over time. According to our previous study,15 a duration of 4 weeks is reasonable and reliable to assess the change of dyspeptic symptoms of patients with FD. Therefore, we followed up participants at the time points of 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks after inclusion. At baseline, the participants will be given the physical examination, outcome assessments and regular tests. The regular tests include routine blood, urine and stool tests, liver and kidney function test, gastroscopy, ultrasonic examination in the upper abdomen and pregnancy test. The pregnancy test is to exclude the risk that acupuncture may bring to pregnant women, who do not know the information. An overview of the measurements at different time points is presented in table 2.
Assessment of adverse events
According to our previous study, acupuncture may cause several adverse events.28 So we will record adverse events caused by acupuncture and the reasons for these events during the treatment and follow-up phases. These adverse events include bleeding, haematoma, fainting, serious pain, local infection, etc. The number of adverse events will be calculated for each group.
Sample size calculation
On the basis of our previous study,15 after receiving 20 sessions of acupuncture treatments, 46.1% of patients with FD with PDS responded to true acupuncture, whereas 14.1% of the patients responded to sham acupuncture, so a difference of 32% was observed. In this trial, different acupuncture protocols were used, so we conservatively expected a responder rate of 50% in the acupuncture group and 25% in the sham acupuncture group, in order to detect a difference of 25% between true and sham acupuncture. Considering a two-sided significant level of 5% and power of 90%, 85 participants per group will be needed, calculated by Fisher's exact test in G*Power(V.3.1.5). To minimise attrition bias, a dropout rate of 15% was considered, making it necessary to include at least 100 participants per group.
The primary analysis will be a comparison of the proportion of patients reporting the absence of dyspeptic symptoms between acupuncture and sham acupuncture at 16 weeks after inclusion (comparison of the primary endpoint). We will use χ2 test to detect the difference between groups, with a significant level of 0.05. To analyse how the primary outcome changes over time after acupuncture treatment, we will use the model of generalised estimating equations with adjustments for clinical centres, baseline assessments of dyspeptic symptoms, duration of the FD symptoms (continuous value calculated by months) and age (continuous value calculated by years). The secondary analysis will be performed to assess the changes of the SF-LDQ, NDI scores and SF-36 from baseline to 24 weeks after inclusion; we use linear mixed models adjusted for clinical sites and baseline scores. The rates of adverse events will be compared between groups. We perform the above analysis using the intention to treat method. Missing values will be handled using the multiple imputation method, on the assumption that values at each time point follow a specific distribution calculated by the computer software R project (V.2.15.3, http://www.R-project.org/). We will also perform a complete-case analysis without imputation of missing values, to find out if the results are consistent with the above analysis. The data will be analysed using SPSS V.20.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corp, Somers, New York).
All data are managed by the data coordinating centre through a third party, the Brightech Magnsoft Data Services Company. This company developed a password-protected website for this trial, which is designed with the function of randomisation, data entry of the research data (including information of screening and eligibility, outcome assessments, adverse events and quality control) and overview of the process of this trial. All data will be backed up in different network drives located both in Chengdu and Beijing.
We describe the rationale, design and analytic methods of a randomised controlled trial comparing acupuncture and sham acupuncture for patients with FD, at different time points. Hopefully, convincing evidence will be found to clarify whether acupuncture is efficacious for this condition.
Before this trial, we have conducted a multicentre randomised trial to assess the effect of acupuncture for patients with FD.15 In the trial, 712 patients with FD were randomly assigned to six groups, four acupuncture groups versus one sham acupuncture group and a drug (Itopride) control group. The results showed that acupuncture at specific points of the stomach meridian is superior to acupuncture at points of other meridians and sham points, as well as oral administration of Itopride. Results of this trial, for the first time, confirmed that acupuncture is superior to Itopride, which was reported to be an efficacious treatment for patients with FD in the year 2006, a couple of months before planning and carrying out of the trial.29 However, Itopride was then reported to be a treatment no better than placebo in a larger sample phase III trial,24 which makes our conclusion that acupuncture is effective for FD still inconclusive. Moreover, although the results showed that acupuncture is superior to sham, it is not conclusive either. A design of four acupuncture arms versus one sham acupuncture arm was used, indicating that there may be a chance that the results are false positive, because of multiple comparisons among groups. In outcome assessments, we used scores of the symptom index of dyspepsia as a primary outcome, which is a scale without going through the validation and reliability test, but is commonly used in China. Thus, the results are not as reliable as we expected, because of a weak primary outcome assessment.
An interesting result of that trial showed that the acupuncture effect seems to last at least 3 months after 20 sessions of acupuncture treatment. However, we are not sure for how long this effect will last, since we followed up the participants for only 16 weeks. This long-lasting effect may be an advantage of acupuncture treatment, which therefore justifies a new trial with a much longer follow-up period.
Combining the above facts, we found that the existing evidence is not enough to draw a firm conclusion on the effectiveness and efficacy of acupuncture for FD. So we hypothesised that: acupuncture is superior to sham acupuncture (acupuncture is efficacious) in relieving the dyspeptic symptoms of patients with FD. To test these hypotheses, we designed this trial, with a control group of sham acupuncture, to reduce the likelihood of reaching a false-positive outcome caused by multiple comparisons. We used a proportion of patients reporting the absence of dyspeptic symptoms as a primary outcome, in order to reach a more reliable conclusion as compared to our previous trial. Moreover, we planned a follow-up period of 24 weeks, in order to fully understand this long-lasting effect of acupuncture for relieving dyspeptic symptoms. In our previous trial, we included patients with FD classified with PDS or EPS. In this trial, we planned to recruit participants with PDS only, because a narrow and specific population will be more appropriate in a trial using efficacy design. To make the recruitment of the participants easier, we will call the participants who joined our previous study to find out if they are interested in attending this study. We will inform them that new types of acupuncture will be used, which will be conducted according to traditional and modern theories, and will be different from the previous acupuncture they received. Also, we will exclude the participants who received sham acupuncture in the last trial, to reduce the risk of unblinding, since we will use the same sham points in this trial.
A major issue in designing this trial is how to distinguish the treatment effect of acupuncture from the effect brought on by other factors, like improvement to a more healthy living style, administration of drugs to improve gastrointestinal function, etc. To minimise the bias contributed by these factors, we considered the following solutions: first, we give the participants an education of a healthy living style in both groups. The participants will receive a handbook of preventing FD, including a healthy style of diet, appropriate exercise to improve gastrointestinal function, etc; second, we ask the participants not to take drugs unless there is an urgent need, for example, dyspeptic symptoms are not relieved after 10 session of acupuncture treatment, or dyspeptic symptoms significantly lower the quality of life; third, we revise our acupuncture protocols several times according to the literature review and expert experience, in order to ensure the effectiveness of the experimental arm.
Another major issue is how to collect data in different time points correctly. Five follow-up time points across 20 weeks are defined in this trial. So we may get inaccurate parameters during outcome assessments in such a long follow-up period. To avoid bias from outcome assessment, we first train the outcome assessors to use telephone interview, email contact to collect follow-up data; second, we ask the assessors to help the participants to fully understand the follow-up questions, in which we try our best to minimise the number of questions, in order to avoid frustration of participants in responding; third, we promise the participants five more acupuncture treatments if they respond to the whole follow-up interview.
This article presents a design and protocol of acupuncture for patients with FD, in order to clarify the efficacy of acupuncture for this condition. The results are expected to give answers to the following questions: first, whether acupuncture is superior to sham acupuncture; second, whether the acupuncture effect lasts longer than the sham effect.
We appreciate the help received from the staff of Brightech Magnsoft Data Services Company, who contributed a lot in the design and statistical analysis plan of this trial. We acknowledge the help and contributions from acupuncturists, experts and investigators in each centre. We also acknowledge the contributions from patients with FD participating in this trial.
HZ and JX contributed equally.
Contributors HZ, JX, JL, XL, LZ, XrC, BG and FrL participated in the design of the trial, in writing the data analysis plan, and in drafting the manuscript. JL, ML and XzL collected the information needed for the performance of this trial in each centre. All the authors discussed, read, revised the manuscript and finally gave approval for publication of this protocol.
Funding This trial was financially supported by the National Basic Research Programme of China ‘973 Program’ (No. 2012CB518501). The funder will not have a role in the conduct or interpretation of this trial, or in any decision to publish the results.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval The study protocol has been approved by the institutional review boards and ethics committees of the first affiliated hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, the first affiliated hospital of Hunan University of TCM and Chongqing Medical University, respectively (from April to August 2012).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.