Article Text

Development and validation of a brief screening instrument for psychosocial risk associated with genetic testing: a pan-Canadian cohort study
  1. Mary Jane Esplen1,2,3,
  2. Mario Cappelli4,
  3. Jiahui Wong2,3,
  4. Joan L Bottorff5,
  5. Jon Hunter2,6,
  6. June Carroll6,
  7. Michel Dorval7,
  8. Brenda Wilson8,
  9. Judith Allanson9,
  10. Kara Semotiuk10,
  11. Melyssa Aronson10,
  12. Louise Bordeleau11,
  13. Nicole Charlemagne1,
  14. Wendy Meschino12
  1. 1University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3de Souza Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  4. 4Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  5. 5University of British Columbia's Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Colombia, Canada
  6. 6Department of Family & Community Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  7. 7Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  8. 8University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  9. 9Department of Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  10. 10Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  11. 11Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  12. 12North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mary Jane Esplen; mesplen{at}uhnres.utoronto.ca

Abstract

Objectives To develop a brief, reliable and valid instrument to screen psychosocial risk among those who are undergoing genetic testing for Adult-Onset Hereditary Disease (AOHD).

Design A prospective two-phase cohort study.

Setting 5 genetic testing centres for AOHD, such as cancer, Huntington's disease or haemochromatosis, in ambulatory clinics of tertiary hospitals across Canada.

Participants 141 individuals undergoing genetic testing were approached and consented to the instrument development phase of the study (Phase I). The Genetic Psychosocial Risk Instrument (GPRI) developed in Phase I was tested in Phase II for item refinement and validation. A separate cohort of 722 individuals consented to the study, 712 completed the baseline package and 463 completed all follow-up assessments. Most participants were female, at the mid-life stage. Individuals in advanced stages of the illness or with cognitive impairment or a language barrier were excluded.

Interventions Phase I: GPRI items were generated from (1) a review of the literature, (2) input from genetic counsellors and (3) phase I participants. Phase II: further item refinement and validation were conducted with a second cohort of participants who completed the GPRI at baseline and were followed for psychological distress 1-month postgenetic testing results.

Primary and secondary outcome measures GPRI, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and Impact of Event Scale (IES).

Results The final 20-item GPRI had a high reliability—Cronbach's α at 0.81. The construct validity was supported by high correlations between GPRI and BSI and IES. The predictive value was demonstrated by a receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 plotting GPRI against follow-up assessments using HAM-D and HAM-A.

Conclusions With a cut-off score of 50, GPRI identified 84% of participants who displayed distress postgenetic testing results, supporting its potential usefulness in a clinical setting.

  • Cancer
  • Psychosocial
  • Screening
  • Psychosocial adjustment
  • behavioural science

this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution non-commercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement: