Neurological assessment of preterm infants for predicting neuromotor status at 2 years: results from the LIFT cohort
- Bénédicte Gaillard Leroux1,2,3,
- Sylvie N'Guyen The Tich3,4,
- Bernard Branger3,
- Géraldine Gascoin3,4,
- Valérie Rouger2,3,
- Isabelle Berlie3,4,
- Yannis Montcho3,5,
- Pierre-Yves Ancel6,
- Jean-Christophe Rozé1,2,3,
- Cyril Flamant1,2,3
- 1Department of Neonatal Medicine, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes University, Nantes, France
- 2Clinical Research Center, INSERM CIC004, University Hospital de Nantes, Nantes, France
- 3Loire Infant Follow-up Team (LIFT) Network, Pays de Loire, Nantes, France
- 4Department of Neonatal Medicine, University Hospital of Angers, Angers University, Angers, France
- 5Department of Neonatal Medicine, Hospital of Le Mans, Nantes, France
- 6Epidemiological Research in Perinatal Health and Women's and Children's Health, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
- Correspondence to Dr Jean Christophe Rozé;
- Received 30 November 2012
- Revised 13 January 2013
- Accepted 24 January 2013
- Published 22 February 2013
Objective To develop a predictive risk stratification model for the identification of preterm infants at risk of 2-year suboptimal neuromotor status.
Design Population-based observational study.
Setting Regional preterm infant follow-up programme (Loire Infant Follow-up Team (LIFT) cohort) implemented in 2003.
Participants 4030 preterm infants were enrolled in the LIFT cohort, and examined by neonatologists using a modified version of the Amiel-Tison neurological assessment tool.
Main outcome criteria 2 year neuromotor status based on clinical examinations was conducted by trained paediatricians and parents’ responses to the Ages and Stages Questionnaire were reported.
Results At 2 years of corrected age, 3321 preterm infants were examined, and suboptimal neuromotor status was found in 355 (10.7%). The study population was divided into training and validation sets. In the training set, 13 neonatal neurological items were associated with a 2-year suboptimal neuromotor status. Having at least one abnormal item was defined as an abnormal neurological status at term. In the validation set, these data predicted a 2-year suboptimal neuromotor status with a sensitivity of 0.55 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.62) and a specificity of 0.65 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.67). Two predictive risk stratification trees were built using the training set, which were based on the neurological assessment at term along with either gestational age or severe cranial lesions or birth weight. Using the validation set, the first tree identified a subgroup with a relatively low risk of suboptimal neuromotor status (3%), representing 32% of infants, and the second tree identified a subgroup with a risk of 5%, representing 42% of infants.
Conclusion A normal neurological assessment at term allows the identification of a subgroup of preterm infants with a lower risk of non-optimal neuromotor development at 2 years.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode