You are here

Article Text

Article menu
XML
Public health
Research
Factors associated with being overweight among Inner Mongolia medical students in China
  1. Jie Chen,
  2. He Yi,
  3. Zhiyue Liu,
  4. Yancun Fan,
  5. Jiang Bian,
  6. Wenfang Guo,
  7. Wulantuya Chang,
  8. Juan Sun
  1. Department of Public Health, Inner Mongolia Medical University, China
  1. Correspondence to Dr Juan Sun; sj6840{at}163.com

Abstract

Objectives A major goal of our study was to identify the associations between lifestyle factors and obesity in adolescents and young adults at risk by surveying students in Inner Mongolia Medical University. A second goal was to determine these factors differed by gender.

Design Cross-sectional study.

Setting Students grade 1–3 in Inner Mongolia Medical University.

Participants 5471 grade 1–3 medical students, composed of 3891 female and 1580 male students. Students with body mass index (BMI) ≥25 were defined as overweight.

Results BMI for male students was 22.1±2.9 and 21.2±2.2 for female students. The prevalence of overweight was 7.6%, with the prevalence being higher for male students compared with females, urban higher than rural and being an only child higher than having sibling children. For male students, urban residence was a risk factor, while for female students being an only child and staying up at night were risk factors, with physical activity a protective factor. A dose-dependency relationship was found between physical fitness and overweight prevalence.

Conclusions This study shows that being an only child and resident in an urban area are risk factors; staying up late and lack of physical activities increased the risk of being overweight. BMI was associated with declines in physical fitness. Our study provides more insight into adolescent obesity problems.

  • Overweight
  • Students
  • Lifestyle
  • Physical Fitness

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003900

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Strengths and limitations of this study

    • Factors in our study were assessed on the basis of self-reported data only, without experimental measurements.

    • In contrast, the response rate and the large number of participants are strengths of the study.

    Introduction

    Globally, obesity has increased among children, adolescents and adults; at least 2.8 million people die each year worldwide as a result of being overweight or obese, with mortality rates being proportional to the degree of obesity.1 Younger age groups are affected, as demonstrated in nearly one-third of the American college students who are overweight or obese.2 According to the WHO, some 30–80% of adults and about 20% of children and adolescents in Europe are overweight.3 The situation in Asia is better, with lower prevalences of obesity in Thailand4 and China,5 although China is experiencing a rapid increase in the number of people classified as overweight or obese.

    With obesity becoming an overwhelming global public health issue, there are a multitude of obesity-associated diseases, including heart disease, diabetes, hypertension and certain cancers. Although obesity is less prominently associated with morbidity in adolescence,6 it is nevertheless a strong precursor of obesity and related morbidity in adulthood.7 Adolescence has been identified as a critical period in the development of overweight/obesity patterns,8 with the transition to college being another potentially important period of risk for weight increase among young adults.9 In China, obesity is increasing,5 with the prevalence of overweight or obesity among men in 1991 increasing from 9.6% and 0.6%, respectively, to 20.0% and 3.0%, respectively, in 2000; the figures were comparable for women, in whom there was an increase from 14.5% and 1.8%, respectively, to 26.5% and 5.2%, respectively.10

    Inner Mongolia is a region inhabited by the Mongolian ethnic minority (1 of 5 minority ethnic autonomous regions in China); there is also a large population of Han people in the region.11 The current study considered the effect of ethnicity on overweight.

    A study showed that 1-child families (only child) were a risk factor for obesity.12 A family-planning policy has been implemented since the 1970s. We considered the effect of 1-child families on overweight.

    On the basis of our previous study,11 the current study focused on demographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors in relation to overweight in medical students in Inner Mongolia. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have analysed factors related to overweight among medical students thus far. As medical students are future health professionals, it is also important to measure their body weight to determine whether this is a problem. The health and health habits of health professionals may influence their attitudes towards relevant professional behaviours, which has been demonstrated by studies of weight status in health professionals.10

    Methods

    Participants

    A cross-sectional survey13 was conducted among medical students at the Inner Mongolia Medical University of China. The survey employed a self-administered questionnaire (see online supplementary file 1).

    In terms of ethnicity, there were three categories: Han, Mongolian (the minority) and other. The ethnicity information of the participants was obtained from basic information in the university database.

    Physical fitness test data

    Physical fitness test data were obtained from the sports department of the school and included height, weight, speed, flexibility, vital capacity and endurance score data. We used height and weight to determine the body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) based on the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute criteria as follows: <18.5 underweight; 18.5–24.9 normal weight; 25–30 overweight; BMI ≥30 was considered obese.14 In our study, BMI ≥25 were considered as overweight. We categorised the students’ physical health status according to the college student physical health standard defined by the Ministry of Education of China and General Administration of Sport of China.15 Flexibility was measured by sit-and-reach, and vital capacity by a vital capacity meter; vital capacity was calculated as follows: vital capacity index=vital capacity (mL)/weight index (kg), with <60 as ‘poor’, 60–69 ‘normal’, 70–79 ‘intermediate’, 80–89 ‘good’ and 90–100 ‘excellent’. Speed score was measured by a 100 m run; in men, times of >14.9 s were awarded a score of <60; 14.2–14.9 s, 60–69; 13.8–14.1 s, 70–79; 13.2–13.7 s, 80–89; <13.1 s, 90–100, and in women, >17.9 s was awarded a score of <60; 17.4–17.9 s, 60–69; 16.8–17.3 s, 70–79; 16.2–16.7 s, 80–89; <16.2, 90–100. Endurance was evaluated in women with a 800 m run: time >4 min and 24 s were awarded a score of <60; 4 min and 8 s–4 min and 23 s, 60–69; 3 min and 52 s–4 min and 7 s, 70–79; 3 min and 39 s–3 min and 51 s, 80–89; <3 min and 50 s, as 90–100 and a 1 km run for men, with >4 min and 33 s being awarded a score of <60; 4 min and 12 s–4 min and 32 s, 60–69; 3 min and 52 s–4 min and 11 s, 70–79;3 min and 39 s–3 min and 51 s, 80–89; <3 min and 50 s, 90–100.

    Survey data

    The data were collected from December 2010 to January 2011 from 5471 grade 1–3 medical students; there were 3891 women and 1580 men.

    The survey was carried out in the classroom. In cooperation with faculty management, students were informed of the purposes of the study. They were assured of confidentiality and that participation was voluntary.

    Investigators distributed questionnaires and asked students to complete the questionnaires in the classroom. Participants returned the completed questionnaire to the investigators, some of whom checked the questionnaire while others counted the number of questionnaires. Finally, the investigators placed the questionnaires in a sealed envelope.13

    The self-report questionnaire contained questions about basic information, including student ID, sex, ethnicity, living habits and feelings experienced while in college.11 ,13 ,16 In the questionnaire, the following definitions were used: students who used to reside in cities or the suburbs were urban; those previously residing in villages or pastoral areas were rural; ‘only child’ was defined a person without siblings. Breakfast was defined according to Alexander: “Subjects who did not consume breakfast on both days were categorised as breakfast skippers. Subjects who consumed breakfast on one of the two days were categorised as occasional breakfast eaters, while those that consumed breakfast on both days were classified as breakfast eaters.”17 Based on Olds TS's study about ‘Activity Patterns’ which was recommended by Australian government, ‘sports participant’ was defined as a person who participated in moderate to vigorous physical activity at least 1 h/day over 4 days/week.18 We referred to Giannotti et al's19 research on ‘Evening-types’: significantly later bedtimes on weekdays and weekends, to defined ‘staying up’ as going to bed after midnight over 2 days/week; ‘smoker’ was defined as current daily smoking or occasional smoking according to Bian et al13 which was initially based on the National Centre for Health Statistics.20 ‘Gastrointestinal problems’ were defined as recurring symptoms of sufficient significance to alter lifestyle or require chronic treatment according to Stone et al's21 report, and ‘quality of relationships’ (poor, medium, good) was self-assessed.

    Statistical analysis

    A χ2 test was used to examine the differences of prevalence of overweight by sex according to demographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. Crude ORs were calculated to evaluate the risk of exposure effects in the group studied relative to the reference group and associated 95% CIs. Non-conditional binary logistic regression analysis was used to ascertain factors associated with being overweight. This method was used for analyses with dependent variables in two categories (overweight and normal weight). Adjusted OR used logistic regression models to explore the effect of independent variables on the dependent variable in the model. In the models, OR >1.0 indicated an increased overweight risk and OR <1.0 indicated protective factors. An independent-sample t test was used to compare physical scores in overweight versus normal weight groups by sex. The trend χ2 test was used to ascertain any dose-dependent relationships between the prevalence of overweight and physical fitness according to sex.

    A significance level of p=0.05 was accepted for all analyses. Quantitative data were inputted using EpiData V.3.1 and analysed using SPSS V.13.0.

    Results

    Sample characteristics

    Of 5673 grade 1–3 students registered in the school, 5471 (96.44%) completed our survey. Of 5471 students, 414 were overweight. The overall prevalence of overweight was 7.6%. Because our research focused on overweight, 356 underweight students were not analysed. There were 1580 men and 3891 women. The mean age of the participants was 21.0±1.4 years.

    BMI and prevalence of overweight or obese

    The BMI for men was 22.1±2.9; that for women was 21.2±2.2. On an average, men had higher BMI than women.

    Overweight-related factors

    The prevalence of overweight among men was significantly higher than that among women (13.6% vs 5.1%). The prevalence of overweight in male students who were prior urban residents was nearly twice that of prior rural residents, and in ‘only child’ (table 1). In women, the prevalence of overweight in only children was nearly twice that of those who were not, and nearly 50% higher in prior urban residents compared with prior rural residents. In prior urban residents, the prevalence of overweight for only children was 12.5% vs 7.8% of those with siblings. In prior rural residents, the pattern was similar but overall prevalence was lower: 8.8% vs. 5.8%. In male students, prevalence of overweight was substantially higher as compared with female students when comparing urban versus rural, and then only children versus children with siblings: 21.2% vs. 15.8% and 11.5% vs. 10.6% (men), 8.4% vs. 5.2% and 5.8% vs. 4.3% (women), respectively. The prevalence of overweight was 50% higher in students who skipped breakfast compared with their breakfast-eating counterparts. Similarly, the prevalence of overweight in students who were smokers or stayed up late was nearly double compared with those who did not.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Prevalence of overweight by sex

    Factors associated with being overweight

    Students who were prior urban residents were at higher risk for being overweight. Although male students who were only children or stayed up late were at higher risk for being overweight in univariate analysis; there was no difference in multivariate analysis. There was no difference in overweight between Mongolian and Han ethnicities (table 2).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Univariate (crude OR) and multivariate (adjusted OR) logistic regression analysis of being overweight by sex

    In female students, only children had nearly 1.5 times higher risk of being overweight compared with those who had siblings; staying up late was associated with a similar level of risk. However, unlike men, participating in sports was protective for women. While univariate analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of being overweight with higher monthly expenses, this risk became non-significant in multivariate analysis. Quality of relationships had no impact on being overweight.

    Physical fitness in overweight and normal-weight students

    The physical scores of normal weight and overweight students were compared for male and female students, respectively (table 3). A reduced physical score was found for all items in men and three items (speed, vital capacity and endurance) in women. The highest reduction between normal weight and overweight participants was for vital capacity.

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Comparison of physical score between normal weight and overweight by sex

    Dose-dependent relationship between overweight prevalence and physical fitness score

    Analysing the associations between physical fitness score and the prevalence of overweight, we found that as physical fitness score increased, the prevalence of overweight decreased in the categories of speed, vital capacity and endurance (table 4). This suggested a dose-dependent relationship between physical fitness and the prevalence of overweight. However, we did not find this trend with regard to flexibility for both sexes.

    View this table:
    Table 4

    Trend χ2 test between physical fitness score and overweight prevalence by sex

    Discussion

    While many studies have reported that demographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors are associated with adolescent obesity, the results are not always consistent; therefore, we carried out a survey to investigate whether these factors constituted a risk for being overweight in medical students.

    The prevalence of overweight was 7.6%. This is considerably lower compared with the reported prevalence among the general Chinese population.22 The prevalence of overweight in the current study was also lower compared with other reports of college students in the USA23 and in European countries such as Greece.24 Consistent with other research,2 ,4 the male students in our study had significantly higher mean BMI than the female students, although the values were considerably lower compared with American college students,2 but higher than that in Thai college students.4 Our results suggest that overweight was significantly more prevalent in male students than in female students. This finding is consistent with the recently reported data.2 ,11 The higher prevalence of overweight and obesity among men may be partially due to the fact that male students are usually satisfied with their weight and body image, in addition to bulking up and increasing muscle/weight.2 Thus, female college students are more likely to perceive themselves as overweight and attempt to lose weight more often.25 These factors may explain the sex discrepancy in BMI prevalence.

    The demographic factor of being an only child in relation to overweight has been studied.26 In our study, ‘only children’ were distinguished from that in other countries as China is one of the few countries to enforce a family planning policy, and since the advent of the family planning policy in the 1970s, children without siblings—only children—have become more numerous as a group. The prevalence of overweight in only children is higher because the only child always lives in more favourable conditions. Our study showed that about 60% of all only children had monthly expenses >¥600, while <30% of students with siblings spent the same amount monthly.

    Our results also provide some support for the type of residency being important in relation to being overweight. Numerous studies have reported that adolescents residing in urban areas have a higher risk of being overweight. For example, this is the case in Thailand.27 Conversely, the authors of a Canadian study reported that there was a trend for increasing overweight or obesity among adolescents as the degree of living in a rural area improved.27 Over the past three decades, China has enjoyed economic development and the population has experienced lifestyle changes. Reductions in physical activity and labour intensity in urban and rural areas have been observed, and in 2010, the prevalence of overweight or obesity in men was higher than in women and in urban residents compared with rural residents.28 This result appears to originate from cultural attitudes and beliefs. For urban students, the perception is that the pursuit of academic excellence holds greater status than physical activity. Typically, parents encourage their children to engage in educational and spiritual activities rather than physical activities, but rural students are additionally expected to participate in some physically demanding farming activities.29

    Besides demographic factors, we also investigated lifestyle factors. Students who stay up late face an increased risk of being overweight. Noland et al30 reported that students with fewer hours of sleep were significantly more likely to be overweight; other researchers have found that shorter sleep periods are associated with decreased leptin levels, increased ghrelin levels and increased hunger and appetite.31 ,32

    Although lack of physical activity increases the risk of obesity, being overweight also is associated with poor physical fitness. We found that overweight adolescents generally had poorer physical fitness than their normal-weight counterparts. This result is in agreement with our previous medical student study.11 In the present study, overweight students had lower speed, endurance and vital capacity, a finding similar to that of another investigation.33 There was no difference in flexibility between overweight and normal-weight students. This is in line with a Taiwanese study34 but contrasts a Western report in which overweight girls achieved slightly better sit-and-reach results than normal-weight girls.35 Flexibility, therefore, appears to be consistently less influenced by body weight. There was a dose-dependent relationship in our study, with physical fitness score increasing as prevalence of overweight declined. The authors of another Chinese study reported that obese children are less mobile and less self-confident, which make them participate in less physical activities, leaving them at risk for chronic disease.33 Again, this suggests a vicious cycle: being overweight leads to less physical activities and poor physical fitness, in turn increasing the risk of being overweight.

    Socioeconomic factors were not related with overweight. However, it is worth mentioning that good relationships may stimulate participation in more sports activities, which could reduce the risk of obesity.36

    In our study of lifestyle factors, skipping breakfast and being a smoker did not affect overweight. The result was similar to that of two previous reports.37 ,38

    Although the association of the factors above with being overweight are well known, and medical students are future health professionals, some have the persistent habits of staying up late and engaging in less physical activities. They do not have deep understanding of the significance of the potential danger of these habits. This could be a reflection of the attitude of our college students regarding these well-known factors. Changing their attitude is the key to reducing the risk factors for inappropriate body weight.

    There are limitations to this study. Overweight-related factors were assessed on the basis of self-reported data only, without experimental measurements. The response rate and the large number of participants are strengths of the study.

    References

    1. ↵
      World Health Organiztion. Global Health Observatory. 2012. http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/obesity_text/en/
    2. ↵
      1. Sira N,
      2. Pawlak R
      . Prevalence of overweight and obesity, and dieting attitudes among Caucasian and African American college students in Eastern North Carolina: a cross-sectional survey. Nutr Res Pract 2010;4:36–42.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    3. ↵
      WHO Regional Office for Europe. The challenge of obesity in the WHO European Region and the strategies for response. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 2007.
    4. ↵
      1. Banwell C,
      2. Lim L,
      3. Seubsman SA,
      4. et al
      . Body mass index and health-related behaviours in a national cohort of 87,134 Thai open university students. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63:366–72.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Li M,
      2. Dibley MJ,
      3. Sibbritt D,
      4. et al
      . An assessment of adolescent overweight and obesity in Xi'an City, China. Int J Pediatr Obes 2006;1:50–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. ↵
      1. Berenson Gs,
      2. Srinivasan SR,
      3. Bao W,
      4. et al
      . Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1650–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      1. Guo SS,
      2. Chumlea WC
      . Tracking of body mass index in children in relation to overweight in adulthood. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70:145S–8S.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Sun Y,
      2. Sekine M,
      3. Kagamimori S
      . Lifestyle and overweight among Japanese adolescents: the Toyama Birth Cohort Study. J Epidemiol 2009;19:303–10.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Gow RW,
      2. Trace SE,
      3. Mazzeo SE
      . Preventing weight gain in first year college students: an online intervention to prevent the “freshman fifteen”. Eat Behav 2010;11:33–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Wildman RP,
      2. Gu D,
      3. Muntner P,
      4. et al
      . Trends in overweight and obesity in Chinese adults: between 1991 and 1999–2000. Obesity 2008;16:1448–53.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      1. Bian J,
      2. Yi H,
      3. Liu Z,
      4. et al
      . Prevalence of and factors associated with various level of body weight among Inner Mongolia medical students in China. Open J Prev Med 2012;2:123–30.
      OpenUrl
    12. ↵
      1. Ravelli GP,
      2. Belmont L
      . Obesity in nineteen-year-old men: family size and birth order associations. Am J Epidemiol 1979;109:66–70.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      1. Bian J,
      2. Du M,
      3. Liu Z,
      4. et al
      . Prevalence of and factors associated with daily smoking among Inner Mongolia medical students in China: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2012;7:20.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    14. ↵
      Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults—The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res 1998;6:51S–209S.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      Ministry of Education of China and General Administration of Sport of China. College student physical health standard. Beijing, 2008.
    16. ↵
      1. Chen J,
      2. Wu Y,
      3. Yi H,
      4. et al
      . The impact of academic stress on medical students attending college in the inner Mongolia area of China. Open J Prev Med 2013;3:149–54.
      OpenUrl
    17. ↵
      1. Alexander KE,
      2. Ventura EE,
      3. Spruijt-Metz D,
      4. et al
      . Association of breakfast skipping with visceral fat and insulin indices in overweight Latino youth. Obesity 2009;17:1528–33.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. Olds TS,
      2. Maher CA,
      3. Matricciani L
      . Sleep duration or bedtime? exploring the relationship between sleep habits and weight status and activity patterns. Sleep 2011;34:1299–307.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      1. Giannotti F,
      2. Cortesi F,
      3. Sebastiani T,
      4. et al
      . Circadian preference, sleep and daytime behaviour in adolescence. J Sleep Res 2002;11:191–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      1. Pleis JR,
      2. Lethbridge-Cejku M
      . Summary health statistics for US adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2006. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2007;10:1–153.
      OpenUrl
    21. ↵
      1. Stone JM,
      2. Nino-Murcia M,
      3. Wolfe VA,
      4. et al
      . Chronic gastrointestinal problems in spinal cord injury patients: a prospective analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 1990;85:1114–19.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      1. Wu Y,
      2. Ma G,
      3. Hu Y,
      4. et al
      . The current prevalence status of body overweight and obesity in China: data from the China National Nutrition and Health Survey. Chinese J Prev Med 2005;39:316–20.
      OpenUrl
    23. ↵
      1. Harvey-Berino J,
      2. Pope L,
      3. Gold BC,
      4. et al
      . Undergrad and overweight: an online behavioral weight management program for college students. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012;44:604–8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Bertsias G,
      2. Mammas I,
      3. Linardakis M,
      4. et al
      . Overweight and obesity in relation to cardiovascular disease risk factors among medical students in Crete, Greece. BMC Public Health 2003;3:3.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Ackard DM,
      2. Peterson CB
      . Association between puberty and disordered eating, body image, and other psychological variables. Int J Eat Disord 2001;29:187–94.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Zeigler-Johnson C,
      2. Weber A,
      3. Glanz K,
      4. et al
      . Gender- and ethnic-specific associations with obesity: individual and neighborhood-level factors. J Natl Med Assoc Summer 2013;105:173–82.
      OpenUrl
    27. ↵
      1. Aekplakorn W,
      2. Hogan MC,
      3. Chongsuvivatwong V,
      4. et al
      . Trends in obesity and associations with education and urban or rural residence in Thailand. Obesity 2007;15:3113–21.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Ma J,
      2. Cai C,
      3. Wang H,
      4. et al
      . The trend analysis of overweight and obesity in Chinese students during 1985–2010. Chinese J Prev Med 2012;46:776–80.
      OpenUrl
    29. ↵
      1. Al-Nuaim AA,
      2. Al-Nakeeb Y,
      3. Lyons M,
      4. et al
      . The prevalence of physical activity and sedentary behaviours relative to obesity among adolescents from Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia: rural versus urban variations. J Nutr Metab 2012;2012:417589.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Noland H,
      2. Price JH,
      3. Dake J,
      4. et al
      . Adolescents’ sleep behaviors and perceptions of sleep. J Sch Health 2009;79:224–30.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    31. ↵
      1. Spiegel K,
      2. Tasali E,
      3. Penev P,
      4. et al
      . Brief communication: sleep curtailment in healthy young men is associated with decreased leptin levels, elevated ghrelin levels, and increased hunger and appetite. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:846–50.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      1. Taheri S,
      2. Lin L,
      3. Austin D,
      4. et al
      . Short sleep duration is associated with reduced leptin, elevated ghrelin, and increased body mass index. PLoS Med 2004;1:e62.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Shang X,
      2. Liu A,
      3. Li Y,
      4. et al
      . The association of weight status with physical fitness among Chinese children. Int J Pediatr 2010;2010:515414.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Chen LJ,
      2. Fox KR,
      3. Haase A,
      4. et al
      . Obesity, fitness and health in Taiwanese children and adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006;60:1367–75.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    35. ↵
      1. Prista A,
      2. Maia JA,
      3. Damasceno A,
      4. et al
      . Anthropometric indicators of nutritional status: implications for fitness, activity, and health in school-age children and adolescents from Maputo, Mozambique. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:952–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    36. ↵
      1. Blanchard CM,
      2. McGannon KR,
      3. Spence JC,
      4. et al
      . Social ecological correlates of physical activity in normal weight, overweight, and obese individuals. Int J Obes 2005;29:720–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    37. ↵
      1. Nicklas TA,
      2. Morales M,
      3. Linares A,
      4. et al
      . Children's meal patterns have changed over a 21-year period: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104:753–61.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    38. ↵
      1. Revicki D,
      2. Sobal J,
      3. DeForge B
      . Smoking status and the practice of other unhealthy behaviors. Fam Med 1991;23:361–4.
      OpenUrlPubMed

    Supplementary materials

    • Supplementary Data

      This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

      Files in this Data Supplement:

    Footnotes

    • Contributors JC, ZL, JB and JS designed the study, acquired and analysed the data and prepared the manuscript. JS, ZL, WG and WC assisted in the data analysis and interpretation. YE supervised the study.

    • Funding The study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia in China and 2013MS1193 from the Ministry of Science and Technology.

    • Competing interests None.

    • Ethics approval Ethical approval to conduct the study, in which consent was required from all study participants, was obtained from the Ethical Committee of Inner Mongolia.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.