Article Text

PDF

Responses to concerns about child maltreatment: a qualitative study of GPs in England
  1. Jenny Woodman1,
  2. Ruth Gilbert1,
  3. Janice Allister2,
  4. Danya Glaser3,
  5. Marian Brandon4
  1. 1Department of Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCL-Institute of Child Health, London, UK
  2. 2Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK
  3. 3Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London, London, UK
  4. 4Centre for Research on Children and Families, Elizabeth Fry Building, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
  1. Correspondence to Jenny Woodman; j.woodman{at}ucl.ac.uk, jenny.woodman{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives To provide a rich description of current responses to concerns related to child maltreatment among a sample of English general practitioners (GPs).

Design In-depth, face-to-face interviews (November 2010 to September 2011). Participants selected and discussed families who had prompted ‘maltreatment-related concerns’. Thematic analysis of data.

Setting 4 general practices in England.

Participants 14 GPs, 2 practice nurses and 2 health visitors from practices with at least 1 ‘expert’ GP (expertise in child safeguarding/protection).

Results The concerns about neglect and emotional abuse dominated the interviews. GPs described intense and long-term involvement with families with multiple social and medical problems. Narratives were distilled into seven possible actions that GPs took in response to maltreatment-related concerns. These were orientated towards whole families (monitoring and advocating), the parents (coaching) and children (opportune healthcare), and included referral to or working with other services and recording concerns. Facilitators of the seven actions were: trusting relationships between GPs and parents, good working relationships with health visitors and framing the problem/response as ‘medical’. Narratives indicated significant time and energy spent building facilitating relationships with parents with the aim of improving the child's well-being.

Conclusions These GPs used core general practice skills for on-going management of families who prompted concerns about neglect and emotional abuse. Policy and research focus should be broadened to include strategies for direct intervention and on-going involvement by GPs, such as using their core skills during consultations and practice systems for monitoring families and encouraging presentation to general practice. Exemplars of current practice, such as those identified in our study, should be evaluated for feasibility and acceptability in representative general practice settings as well as tested for efficacy, safety and cost. The seven actions could form the basis for the ‘lead professional’ role in general practice as proposed in the 2013 version of ‘Working Together ’guidance.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.