Article Text

Optimising drug prescribing and dispensing in subjects at risk for drug errors due to renal impairment: improving drug safety in primary healthcare by low eGFR alerts
  1. Hanneke Joosten1,
  2. Iefke Drion2,
  3. Kees J Boogerd3,
  4. Emiel V van der Pijl3,
  5. Robbert J Slingerland4,
  6. Joris P J Slaets1,5,
  7. Tiele J Jansen6,
  8. Olof Schwantje7,
  9. Reinold O B Gans1,
  10. Henk J G Bilo2
  1. 1University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
  2. 2Isala Clinics, Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes Centre, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  3. 3Pharmacy De Fenix (previously Boogerd Kluin), Zwolle, The Netherlands
  4. 4Isala Clinics, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  5. 5University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, University Center for Geriatric Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
  6. 6GP Practice de Fenix, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  7. 7GP Practice Assendorp, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Drs Hanneke Joosten; j.m.h.joosten{at}umcg.nl

Abstract

Objectives To assess the risk of medication errors in subjects with renal impairment (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤40 ml/min/1.73 m2) and the effectiveness of automatic eGFR ≤40-alerts relayed to community pharmacists.

Design Clinical survey.

Setting The city of Zwolle, The Netherlands, in a primary care setting including 22 community pharmacists and 65 general practitioners.

Participants All adults who underwent ambulatory creatine measurements which triggered an eGFR ≤40-alert.

Primary and secondary outcome measures The total number of ambulatory subjects with an eGFR ≤40-alert during the study period of 1 year and the number of medication errors related to renal impairment. The type and number of proposed drug adjustments recommended by the community pharmacist and acceptance rate by the prescribing physicians. Classification of all medication errors on their potential to cause an adverse drug event (ADE) and the actual occurrence of ADEs (limited to those identified through hospital record reviews) 1 year after the introduction of the alerts.

Results Creatine measurements were performed in 25 929 adults. An eGFR ≤40-alert was indicated for 5.3% (n=1369). This group had a median (IQR) age of 78 (69, 84) years, and in 73% polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) was present. In 15% (n=211) of these subjects, a medication error was detected. The proportion of errors increased with age. Pharmacists recommended 342 medication adjustments, mainly concerning diuretics (22%) and antibiotics (21%). The physicians’ acceptance rate was 66%. Of all the medication errors, 88% were regarded as potential ADEs, with most classified as significant or serious. At follow-up, the ADE risk (n=40) appeared highest when the proposed medication adjustments were not implemented (38% vs 6%).

Conclusions The introduction of automatic eGFR-alerts identified a considerable number of subjects who are at risk for ADEs due to renal impairment in an ambulatory setting. The nationwide implementation of this simple protocol could identify many potential ADEs, thereby substantially reducing iatrogenic complications in subjects with impaired renal function.

  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Primary Care

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement: