You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Infectious diseases
Research
Candida parapsilosis candidaemia in a neonatal unit over 7 years: a case series study
  1. Lourdes das Neves Miranda1,
  2. Eliete C A Rodrigues2,
  3. Silvia F Costa1,
  4. Inneke Marie van der Heijden1,
  5. Kátia C Dantas2,
  6. Renata D Lobo3,
  7. Mariusa Basso3,
  8. Gláucia F Varkulja3,
  9. Vera Lúcia Jornada Krebs4,
  10. Maria Augusta Bento Cicaroni Gibelli4,
  11. Paulo R Criado2,
  12. Anna Sara Levin1,3
  1. 1Department of Infectious Diseases and LIM 54, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  2. 2Department of Dermatology and LIM 53, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  3. 3Infection Control Department, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  4. 4Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal Unit of Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  1. Correspondence to Professor Anna Sara Levin; gcih@hcnet.usp.br, anna@usp.br

Abstract

Objective To evaluate Candida parapsilosis candidaemia in a neonatal unit over 7 years.

Design Case series study.

Setting A 2000-bed tertiary-care university hospital at São Paulo, Brazil.

Participants Neonates hospitalised in a 63-bed neonatal unit.

Primary and secondary outcome measures We evaluated the incidence of C parapsilosis fungemia in a neonatal unit from 2002 through 2008 and the main microbiological, clinical and epidemiological aspects of this disease in neonates. During the study period an outbreak occurred, an infection control programme was implemented, and isolates from blood and hand healthcare workers (HCWs) were submitted to molecular typing.

Results During 7 years, there were 36 cases of C parapsilosis fungaemia and annual incidence varied from 0 to 19.7 per 1000 admissions. Evaluating 31 neonates with fungemia, the mean age at diagnosis was 19 days. All children except for one were premature; all had received total parenteral nutrition and all but one had used central venous catheter. Three neonates had received antifungal treatment previously to the diagnosis. Thirty-day mortality was 45%. Only lower birthweight was associated with mortality. C parapsilosis species complex was isolated from hand cultures in eight (11%) of the HCWs (one isolate was identified as C orthopsilosis). By molecular typing no HCW isolate was similar to any of the blood isolates.

Conclusions The incidence of C parapsilosis fungemia in a neonatal unit varied widely over 7 years. We observed in our series a higher death rate than that reported in European countries and the USA.

  • Epidemiology
  • Infection control
  • Molecular diagnostics
  • Neonatal intensive & critical care

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000992

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Article summary

    Article focus

    • Candida species are the third most common blood culture isolates recovered from cases of late-onset sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit.

    • Candida parapsilosis is probably the species that has had the largest increase in incidence since 1990, becoming the predominant agent of candidaemia in certain centres.

    • Systemic infections because of C parapsilosis have been associated with significantly better survival rates when compared with infections caused by other species.

    • Understand the epidemiology of C. parapsilosis candidemia in a Brazilian NICU, given the local situation is distinct from that found in series from developing countries.

    Key messages

    • In our study, mortality was 45%, higher than expected for Candida parapsilosis candidaemia and we describe points that could explain this result.

    • We speculate that some points could explain this result: low birth weights, failure to remove catheter and delay to start a treatment.

    • One must understand the epidemiology of C parapsilosis candidaemia in a Brazilian neonatal intensive care unit, given the local situation is distinct from that found in series from developing countries.

    • To our knowledge this is the largest Brazilian clinical and epidemiological description of neonatal C. parapsilosis candidemia.

    • An outbreak occurred with a polyclonal pattern, suggesting multiple sources. Strengths and limitations.

    • Molecular typing methods were performed to investigate the outbreak.

    • Only one sample per patient and one per healthcare worker was evaluated during the outbreak, and this was a limitation to the present study.

    Introduction

    Candida species are the leading cause of invasive fungal infections in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and are the third most common blood culture isolates recovered from cases of late-onset sepsis in the NICU.1–5 C parapsilosis is probably the species that has had the largest increase in incidence since 1990, becoming the predominant agent of candidaemia in certain centres.6–9 Numerous risk factors for candidaemia have been identified in NICU patients such as immature skin structure,10 prolonged use of antimicrobials,11 indwelling central venous catheters,12 hyperalimentation,13 mechanical ventilation,11 surgery14 or pre-existing fungal colonisation.8 ,13 ,15

    In Brazil, there are few data assessing exclusively the epidemiology of C parapsilosis candidaemia,16 ,17 and in the neonatal population only a description of a cluster with three cases of C parapsilosis sepsis.18 So far, no description of the epidemiology of C parapsilosis candidaemia was evaluated in the NICU setting.

    We conducted a retrospective, observational study involving a NICU in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, to evaluate the incidence rates of C parapsilosis candidaemia over a 7-year period in our hospital and to characterise the main microbiological, clinical and epidemiological aspects of this disease in neonates.

    Methods

    Hospital das Clínicas is a 2000-bed tertiary-care university hospital affiliated to the University of São Paulo, Brazil. It has a neonatal unit with 63 beds that accepts only babies born in the hospital, usually from high-risk pregnancies. There are five sections within the unit: for normal newborns (23 beds); medium-risk unit (15 beds); high-risk (9 beds); isolation (8 beds) and a neonatal intensive care unit (8 beds).

    We evaluated the incidence of fungemia during a 7-year period beginning in 2002 through 2008. Cases were collected prospectively by the infection control nurses during active surveillance at the neonatal unit. A case was defined as a baby hospitalised in the neonatal unit, born in the hospital, who presented with at least one positive blood culture collected from a peripheral vein for C parapsilosis. Only the first episode of candidaemia for each newborn was considered. The annual incidence of candidaemia for the neonatal unit was calculated using as a denominator the number of admissions (except for the normal newborn admissions).

    Clinical data

    We reviewed the hospital records of neonates with candidaemia caused by C parapsilosis. The demographic and clinical data evaluated were: sex, birth weight, type of delivery, Apgar score19 and underlying diseases; postnatal age at the time of infection; use of invasive procedures such as central venous catheter (CVC), total parenteral nutrition (TPN), dialysis, infections caused by other microorganisms, surgery and use of antimicrobial (the days of use of each drug were added), steroids and antifungal drugs during the previous 30 days; and clinical outcome 30 days after diagnosis. Prophylaxis with fluconazole was not used.

    C parapsilosis outbreak

    During the period from May 2004 through July 2005, an investigation designed to evaluate Candida colonisation in candidaemic patients in the main building of the hospital, where the neonatal unit is located,20 was taken. During this study a large number of cases of candidaemia caused by C parapsilosis were observed in the neonatal unit. An outbreak of C parapsilosis was suspected and an infection control programme was started in the unit. Besides colonisation isolates, C parapsilosis blood isolates from these patients were available for further microbiological study. Hand cultures were obtained from healthcare workers (HCW) of the unit, except physicians who refused having their hands sampled.

    The healthcare practices in the neonatal unit were evaluated, meetings with the medical and nursing staff were held and visits were made to the Pharmacy where TPN was produced.

    The following control measures were implemented starting in April 2005:

    • Changes in the composition of TPN and prohibition of adding components to the solution by the staff of the unit.

    • Decrease in the number of patients admitted, applying strict admission criteria, so as to achieve a monthly occupation rate of 90%.

    • Increase in the availability of supplies such as gowns and antiseptic solutions.

    Microbiological methods

    The blood cultures had been collected due to clinical indication by the physician of each patient and were performed in the clinical laboratory of the hospital using an automated system (Bactec 9240, Becton Dickinson, USA).

    The hands of the HCWs who had direct contact with patients were cultured from March to June 2005, by swabbing the interdigital areas and under their nails, using sterile swabs with Stuart medium.

    Specimens were inoculated on Sabouraud dextrose (Difco, Sparks, USA) broth supplemented with chloramphenicol agar (100 mg/ml).21 Cultures were considered negative if no growth occurred for 21 days.

    The phenotypic identification of the isolates of C parapsilosis from the blood and hands of HCWs was done by the morphology of colonies, germ tube test, chromogenic medium (CHROMagar Microbiology, Paris, France) and carbon assimilation test (ID 32C; bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France).22 Identification was confirmed manually using the test of carbohydrate assimilation.23

    All the available isolates that were identified morphologically and biochemical as C parapsilosis had the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and the ribosomal RNA gene amplified with the utilisation of the primers ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCG CTTATTGATATGC-3′).24 The PCR products were then purified and subjected to automated DNA sequencing. The aligned sequences were then analysed with BioEdit sequence programme.25 Further analysis was performed by comparison with ITS sequences of C parapsilosis, C metapsilosis and C orthopsilosis included in the BLAST.25

    Two molecular typing methods were performed for C parapsilosis isolated from the blood of neonates and from hands of HCWs.

    1. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as described previously26 ,27 and generated electrophoretic karyotypes (EK).

    2. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) typing was performed as described previously28 ,29 with minor modifications. Four primers were used: Leg 2 (5′-CTGGCTTCTTCCAGCTTCA-3′), Oligo 1 (5′-TCACGATGCA-3′); Oligo 3 (5′-GCCGCCGAAACGATCTAC-3′) and P5 (5′-GTCATGAGGAATCTCGCCTG-3′). Isolates were considered to be different if the banding patterns differed by one, or more than one, readily detectable band. The RAPD analysis was repeated on three separate occasions.

    To be considered indistinguishable, isolates had to be similar by both methods used.

    Statistical analysis

    Patients who died during hospitalisation were compared with patients who survived. Continuous data were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data, and categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test. All p values were two-tailed; a p value of less than 0.05 was considered to reveal a statistically significant difference. Statistical analysis was conducted with Epi Info, V.3.5.3.

    Informed consent was not necessary in our study as cultures were part of our local infection control programme.

    Results

    The number of cases of C parapsilosis fungemia and their incidence in the neonatal unit can be seen in table 1. There was a statistically significant increase in cases from 2002 to 2004 (p: 0.00007), thus an outbreak was identified. From 2002 through 2008 there were 36 cases. The data on this population were available for 31 patients and can be seen in table 2. All data were unavailable for five infants, except for the presence of prematurity and outcome: all were premature and two neonates died. The cases occurred in three sections of the neonatal unit: intensive care unit,27 high-risk (three) and isolation (one).

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Incidence of cases of Candida parapsilosis candidaemia in a neonatal unit from 2002 through 2008 (Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil)

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Characteristics of 31 patients in the neonatal unit with Candida parapsilosis fungemia from 2002 through 2008 (Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil)

    All children except for one were premature; 12 neonates were born weighing <1000 g. Twenty-eight neonates had a CVC at the moment of candidaemia and the median time between diagnosis and catheter removal was 3.5 days (range: 0–16). The median number of previous antimicrobials used per patient was 4 (range: 2–6), and the mean duration of use was 33 days (SD: 17). Third generation cephalosporins and carbapenems were used, by 16 (52%) and 15 (48%) neonates, respectively. The treatment with amphotericin and fluconazole had been used previously to the diagnosis by two and one neonate, respectively. Infants with candidaemia were treated with amphotericin in 26 cases, fluconazole in 2 and a combination of amphotericin and fluconazole in 1. Two patients were not treated and died. The time elapsed between the episodes of candidaemia and starting of antifungal therapy was more than 48 h in 16 neonates (52%).

    The comparison of the clinical features of the cases who died and those who survived can be seen in table 3.

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Bivariate analysis of variables potentially associated with 30-day mortality in neonates with C andida parapsilosis fungemia from 2002 through 2008 (Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil)

    Nine neonates had previous laboratory confirmed bacterial bloodstream infection: five coagulase-negative Staphylococci and one each of Acinetobacter baumannii, Serratia marcescens, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus.

    Outbreak

    During the outbreak, the evaluation of the unit and the observation of practices revealed the following:

    • No problems were observed in the Central Pharmacy with TPN preparation; however manipulation of TPN solutions by nurses, adding components in the neonatal unit occurred.

    • Overcrowding of the unit was observed with the inclusion of extra beds between the officially registered beds.

    • Shortage of supplies such as gowns and antiseptic solutions occurred.

    Recommendations by the Infection Control Department were only fully implemented in 2005. After the interventions the incidence of C parapsilosis fungemia decreased gradually as can be seen in table 1.

    During the 2004–2005 outbreak, 71 HCWs were submitted to cultures of their hands. These represented 90% of the staff of the unit: 20 nurses, 40 assistant nurses, 2 respiratory therapists, 5 administrative workers and 2 cleaning workers. Candida sp. was isolated from hand cultures in 14% of the HCWs, C parapsilosis in eight (11%) and Candida albicans in two (3%). Other yeasts recovered from HCWs included Rhodotorula rubra, Rhodotorula glutinis and Trichosporum sp. (one from each HCW).

    Molecular typing

    Twelve blood C parapsilosis isolates from 11 newborns obtained from May 2004 through July 2005, during the outbreak, and nine C parapsilosis isolates from the hands of eight HCWs underwent molecular typing. The 12 blood isolates from neonates presented eight different EK patterns. The nine hand isolates from HCWs presented seven EK patterns. The RAPD done with primer Leg 2 in 12 blood isolates from 11 neonates yielded only two profiles. Primers Oligo 1, Oligo 3 and P5 did not present a good discriminatory power. The nine hand isolates from HCWs presented five RAPD patterns.

    Considering both typing methods, the nine isolates from HCWs differed between each other and no isolates from HCWs were similar to any of the blood isolates.

    Only two pairs of indistinguishable isolates were found, all of them from blood isolates from newborns. The infants with identical isolates were not in the NICU concurrently.

    All isolates were C parapsilosis except one HCW hand isolate which was identified as C orthopsilosis.

    Discussion

    We described here a case series of neonatal patients with C parapsilosis candidaemia. To our knowledge this is the largest Brazilian clinical and epidemiological description of neonatal C parapsilosis candidaemia.6 ,9 ,30–32

    Greater than 80% of our cases had a gestational age at birth of 30 weeks or less, and nearly 80% had a birth weight of <1500 g, highlighting the significant burden of this disease among premature infants and those with very low birth weight.

    Other neonatal problems resulting in prolonged stay in the NICU may have, also contributed to the occurrence of candidaemia. In our study, most neonates had a CVC at the moment of candidaemia and all had CVC in place and received TPN during the previous 30 days of the diagnosis. Another factor was the long duration of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy used for all neonates.

    Systemic infections due to C parapsilosis have been associated with significantly better survival rates when compared with infections caused by other species. In our study, mortality was 45%, higher than expected.7 ,30 We speculate that some points could explain this result. The neonates who died had lower birth weights comparing with the ones who survived.

    Studies suggest that failure to remove catheter as soon as candidaemia is detected in neonates is a risk factor for death,4 ,33 in our study this factor was frequent, and 55% of neonates had retention of the catheter for at least 2 days after diagnosis of candidaemia. Also in our study, antifungal therapy was started after 48 h in a large proportion of neonates (52%). Delays of more than 48 h to start a treatment may worsen outcome.34 In our study however there was no difference in the delay to remove catheter between patients who died and survived.

    If the gut is the primary source of candidaemia, attempts aimed at reducing gut colonisation, such as the control of exposure to broad-spectrum antimicrobials, and the use of antifungal prophylaxis, may have an impact in reducing the incidence of candidaemia.35 ,36 In contrast, implementation of intensive programmes to maximise compliance with hand hygiene, and adherence to current recommendations for placement and care of CVCs, should be implemented to control exogenous sources.

    In 2004, a large number of cases of C parapsilosis candidaemia were observed in the neonatal unit. An outbreak of C parapsilosis was suspected and the practices of healthcare in the unit were evaluated. The observation of practices revealed the manipulation of TPN solution by nurses in the neonatal unit; overcrowding of the unit with the inclusion of extra beds, and shortage of supplies such as gowns and antiseptic solutions. After recommendations and interventions the incidence of C parapsilosis candidaemia decreased gradually, which further reinforced the hypothesis of exogenous infection. This outbreak offered a great opportunity to study the source of C parapsilosis neonatal candidaemia. Molecular typing of C parapsilosis isolates demonstrated similarity between 12 blood isolates obtained from newborns and 6 catheter tips in a previous study in our hospital,20 without any similarity between blood isolates and isolates that colonised the skin or gastrointestinal tract. This absence of colonisation at other body sites suggests an exogenous source of C parapsilosis. In the present study, no isolates from HCWs were similar to blood isolates, thus no human source could be implicated. This finding was different from prior studies showing possible transmission of yeast strains from HCWs to patients.37 ,38 However, a limitation is that no samples from physicians were obtained.

    In the present study a higher discriminatory power was achieved by combining different typing methods: PCR and PFGE-based typing methods. PFGE presented more profiles than RAPD; however, the combination of both methods was more discriminatory than PFGE alone.

    As discussed above, HCWs were not a primary source and other possible sources such as contaminated solutions or medications would probably lead to a monoclonal outbreak.

    These results suggest that blood strains did not have a common source. Maternal isolates or the environment could be the source of the infants’ blood isolates, but they were not evaluated, which is a limitation of our study.

    Only one sample per patient and one per HCW was evaluated during the outbreak, and this was a limitation to the present study. Future studies that focus on the daily HCW–patient interactions and include multiple sampling, taking into account factors as hand washing, glove use and use of invasive devices, may help to define the role of these interactions in the transmission of yeasts.

    In conclusion, we observed that the incidence rate of C parapsilosis in an NICU varied widely. The crude mortality was higher than reported in European countries and the USA. One must understand the epidemiology of C parapsilosis candidaemia in a Brazilian NICU, given the local situation is distinct from that found in series from developing countries, and particularly with regard to reduced availability of resources in health. An outbreak occurred with a polyclonal pattern, suggesting multiple sources.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Stoll BJ,
      2. Hansen NI,
      3. Adams-Chapman I,
      4. et al
      . Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birthweight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA 2004;292:2357–65.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      1. Benjamin D Jr.,
      2. DeLong E,
      3. Cotten C,
      4. et al
      . Mortality following blood culture in premature infants: increased with Gram-negative bacteremia and candidemia, but not Gram-positive bacteremia. J Perinatol 2004;24:175–80.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Makhoul I,
      2. Sujov P,
      3. Smolkin T,
      4. et al
      . Pathogen-specific early mortality in very low birth weight infants with late onset sepsis: a national survey. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:218–24.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      1. Benjamin DK Jr.,
      2. Stoll BJ,
      3. Fanaroff AA,
      4. et al
      . Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics 2006;117:84–92.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Zaoutis TE,
      2. Heydon K,
      3. Localio R,
      4. et al
      . Outcomes attributable to neonatal candidiasis. Clin Inf Dis 2007;44:1187–93.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. ↵
      1. Rodriguez D,
      2. Almirante B,
      3. Park BJ,
      4. et al
      . Candidemia in Neonatal Intensive Care Units Barcelona, Spain. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:224–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      1. Kossoff EH,
      2. Buescher ES,
      3. Karlowicz MG
      . Candidemia in a neonatal intensive care unit: trends during fifteen years and clinical features of 111 cases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17:504–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Al-Sweih N,
      2. Khan Z,
      3. Khan S,
      4. et al
      . Neonatal candidaemia in Kuwait: a 12-year study of risk factors, species spectrum and antifungal susceptibility. Mycoses 2008;52:518–23.
      OpenUrlWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Blyth CC,
      2. Chen SCA,
      3. Slavin MA,
      4. et al
      . Not just little adults: candidemia epidemiology, molecular characterization, and antifungal susceptibility in neonatal and pediatric patients. Pediatrics 2009;123:1360–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Lupetti A,
      2. Tavanti A,
      3. Davini P,
      4. et al
      . Horizontal transmission of Candida parapsilosis candidemia in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:2363–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Benjamin DK Jr.,
      2. Stoll BJ,
      3. Gantz MG,
      4. et al
      . Neonatal candidiasis: epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical judgment. Pediatrics 2010;126:865–73.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Feja KN,
      2. Wu F,
      3. Roberts K,
      4. et al
      . Risk factors for candidemia in critically ill infants: a matched case-control study. J Pediatr 2005;147:156–61.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Saiman L,
      2. Ludington E,
      3. Pfaller M,
      4. et al
      . Risk factors for candidemia in NICU patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:319–24.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      1. Shetty SS,
      2. Harrison LH,
      3. Hajjeh RA,
      4. et al
      . Determining risk factors for candidemia among newborn infants from population-based surveillance Baltimore, Maryland, 1998–2000. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24:601–4.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      1. El-Mohandes AE,
      2. Johnson-Robbins L,
      3. Keiser JF,
      4. et al
      . Incidence of Candida parapsilosis colonization in an intensive care nursery population and its association with invasive fungal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994;13:520–4.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      1. Brito LR,
      2. Guimarães T,
      3. Nucci M
      . Clinical and microbiological aspects of candidemia due to Candida parapsilosis in Brazilian tertiary care hospitals. Med Mycol 2006;44:261–6.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      1. Medrano DJA,
      2. Brilhante RSN,
      3. Cordeiro RA,
      4. et al
      . Candidemia in a brazilina hospital: the importance of Candida parapsilosis. Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo 2006;48:17–20.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Silva CLP,
      2. Santos RMR,
      3. Colombo AL
      . Cluster of Candida parapsilosis primary bloodstream infection in a neonatal intensive care unit. Braz J Infect Dis 2001;5:32–6.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Apgar V
      . A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 1953;32:260–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Miranda LN,
      2. van der Heijden IM,
      3. Costa SF,
      4. et al
      . Candida colonisation as a source for candidaemia. J Hosp Infect 2009;72:9–16.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Odds FC,
      2. Bernaerts R
      . CHROMagar Candida, a new differential medium for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1923–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      1. Gutierrez J,
      2. Lozano C,
      3. Coronilla J,
      4. et al
      . Evaluation of the ABT 32 C, automicrobic system and API 20 C using clinical yeast isolates. Ann Biol Clin 1994;50:443–6.
      OpenUrl
    23. ↵
      1. Lacaz CS
      . Tratado de micologia médica lacaz. 9a edn. São Paulo: Sarvier, 2002: 618–38.
    24. ↵
      1. White TJ,
      2. Bruns TD,
      3. Lee SB,
      4. et al
      . Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press, 1990:315–22.
    25. ↵
      1. Yong PVC,
      2. Chong PP,
      3. Lau LY,
      4. et al
      . Molecular identification of Candida orthopsilosis isolated from blood culture. Mycopathologia 2008;165:81–7.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    26. ↵
      1. Shin JH,
      2. Shin DH,
      3. Song JW,
      4. et al
      . Electrophoretic karyotype analysis of sequential Candida parapsilosis isolates from patients with persistent or recurrent fungemia. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:1258–63.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      1. Chen KW,
      2. Lo HJ,
      3. Lin YH,
      4. et al
      . Comparison of four molecular typing methods to assess genetic relatedness of Candida albicans clinical isolates in Taiwan. J Med Microbiol 2005;54:249–58.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Binelli CA,
      2. Moretti ML,
      3. Assis RS,
      4. et al
      . Investigation of the possible association between nosocomial candiduria and candidaemia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:538–43.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      1. Vrioni G,
      2. Matsiota-Bernard P
      . Molecular typing of Candida isolates from patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit. J Infect 2001;42:50–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    30. ↵
      1. Roilides E,
      2. Farmaki E,
      3. Evdoridou J,
      4. et al
      . Neonatal candidiasis: analysis of epidemiology, drug susceptibility, and molecular typing of causative isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2004;23:745–50.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    31. ↵
      1. Giusiano GE,
      2. Mangiaterra M,
      3. Rojas F,
      4. et al
      . Yeasts species distribution in neonatal intensive care units in northeast Argentina. Mycoses 2004;47:300–3.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      1. Sastre JBL,
      2. Cotallo GDC,
      3. Colomer FB
      . Neonatal invasive candidiasis: a prospective multicenter study of 118 cases. Am J Perinatol 2003;20:153–63.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    33. ↵
      1. Karlowicz MG,
      2. Hashimoto LN,
      3. Kelly RE,
      4. et al
      . Should central venous catheters be removed as soon as candidemia is detected in neonates? Pediatrics 2000;106:E63.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Nolla-Salas J,
      2. Sitges-Serra A,
      3. Leon-Gil C,
      4. et al
      . Candidaemia in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: analysis of prognostic factors and assessment of systemic antifungal therapy: study group of fungal infection in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 1997;23:23–30.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    35. ↵
      1. Kaufman D,
      2. Boyle R,
      3. Hazen KC,
      4. et al
      . Fluconazole prophylaxis against fungal colonization and infection in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1660–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    36. ↵
      1. Manzoni P,
      2. Arisio R,
      3. Mostert M,
      4. et al
      . Prophylactic fluconazole is effective in preventing fungal colonization and fungal systemic infections in preterm neonates: a single-center, 6-year, retrospective cohort study. Pediatrics 2006;117:22–32.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    37. ↵
      1. Posteraro B,
      2. Bruno S,
      3. Boccia S,
      4. et al
      . Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infection in pediatric oncologic patients: results of an epidemiologic investigation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:641–5.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    38. ↵
      1. Van Asbeck EC,
      2. Huang YC,
      3. Markham AN,
      4. et al
      . Candida parapsilosis fungemia in neonates: genotyping results suggest healthcare workers hands as source, and review of published studies. Mycopathologia 2007;164:287–93.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

    Footnotes

    • Contributors LNM: analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article and final approval of the version to be published; ECAR: acquisition of data, drafting the article and final approval of the version to be published; SFC: analysis and interpretation of data, revising the article critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published; IMH: acquisition of data, revising the article critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published; KCD: analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article and final approval of the version to be published; RDL: acquisition of data, drafting the article and final approval of the version to be published; MB: acquisition of data, revising the article critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published; GFV: acquisition of data, drafting the article and final approval of the version to be published; VLJK: substantial contributions to conception and design, drafting the article and final approval of the version to be published; MABCG: acquisition of data, revising the article critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published; PRC: analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article and final approval of the version to be published; ASL: substantial contributions to conception and design, revising the article critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version to be published.

    • Funding This study was funded by Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.