Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effectiveness of strategies for nutritional therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension in primary care: protocol of a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
  1. Julia Simões Corrêa Galendi,
  2. Renata Giacomini Occhiuto Ferreira Leite,
  3. Adriana Lúcia Mendes,
  4. Vania dos Santos Nunes-Nogueira
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Medical School, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  1. Correspondence to Professor Vania dos Santos Nunes-Nogueira; vania.nunes-nogueira{at}unesp.br

Abstract

Introduction Despite the increasing number of drugs available and various guidelines on the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension, an expressive number of patients continue with these diseases uncontrolled. Nutrition therapy (NT) plays a fundamental role in the prevention and management of these comorbidities, as well as in the prevention of complications related to them. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of NT strategies in the management of patients with T2DM and/or hypertension in primary care. The selected strategies did not substitute pharmaceutical treatment but instead focused on preventing a sedentary lifestyle and stimulating healthy nutrition.

Methods and analysis We will perform a systematic review according to Cochrane methodology of randomised controlled trials, wherein patients with T2DM and/or hypertension were allocated into one of the two groups: NT strategy, which may be of dietary quality or energy restriction, and conventional treatment. The primary outcomes will be glycaemic and blood pressure (BP) control, measured by final glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) and BP (mm Hg), respectively. Four general and adaptive search strategies have been created for the Embase, Medline, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases. Two reviewers will independently select eligible studies, assess the risk of bias and extract data from the included studies. Similar outcomes measured in at least two trials will be plotted in the meta-analysis using Review Manager V.5.3. The quality of evidence of the effect estimate of the intervention will be generated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group.

Ethics and dissemination As no primary data collection will be undertaken, formal ethical assessment is not required. We plan to present the results of this systematic review in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, conferences and the popular press.

PROSPERO registration number Our systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 20 December 2018 (Registration number CRD42018118117).

  • type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • hypertension
  • primary health care
  • nutrition therapy
  • systematic review
  • meta-analysis

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors VdSN-N is the guarantor of the review. All authors developed the systematic review protocol; the manuscript protocol was drafted by VdSN-N and revised by RGOFL, JSCG and ALM. VdSN-N has developed the search strategies. All authors will independently screen the eligible studies, extract data from included studies and assess the risk of bias. VdSN-N will elaborate the standard extract form. VdSN-N will supervise all phases of this review and referee any disagreement to avoid any errors. All authors will participate of data synthesis and quality of evidence. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

  • Funding This project was funded by the Call for Financial Support for Studies in Health Technology Assessment of German Hospital Oswaldo Cruz in partnership with the Brazilian Health Ministry through the Program of Support for the Institutional Development of the Unified Health System (PROADI-SUS) (DECIT/SCTIE/MS-PROADI-SUS, 2018), Grant number 25000.009785/2018-44.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.