Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Implementation strategies for interventions to improve the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by primary care clinicians: protocol for a systematic review
  1. Celia C Kamath1,
  2. Claudia C Dobler2,
  3. Michelle A Lampman1,
  4. Patricia J Erwin3,
  5. John Matulis4,
  6. Muhamad Elrashidi4,
  7. Rozalina Grubina McCoy5,
  8. Mouaz Alsawaz2,
  9. Atieh Pajouhi4,
  10. Amrit Vasdev4,
  11. Nilay D Shah1,
  12. M Hassan Murad2,
  13. Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir4
  1. 1Health Care Policy and Research, Robert D and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  2. 2Evidence-Based Practice Center, Robert D and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  3. 3Mayo Medical Libraries, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  4. 4Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  5. 5Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Celia C Kamath; kamath.celia{at}mayo.edu

Abstract

Introduction There is a considerable implementation gap in managing early stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care despite the high prevalence and risk for increased morbidity and mortality associated with CKD. This systematic review aims to synthesise the evidence of efficacy of implementation interventions aimed at primary care practitioners (PCPs) to improve CKD identification and management. We further aim to describe the interventions’ behavioural change components.

Methods and analysis We will conduct a systematic review of studies from 2000 to October 2017 that evaluate implementation interventions targeting PCPs and which include at least one clinically meaningful CKD outcome. We will search several electronic data bases and conduct reference mining of related systematic reviews and publications. An interdisciplinary team will independently and in duplicate, screen publications, extract data and assess the risk of bias. Clinical outcomes will include all clinically meaningful medical management outcomes relevant to CKD management in primary care such as blood pressure, chronic heart disease and diabetes target achievements. Quantitative evidence synthesis will be performed, where possible. Planned subgroup analyses include by (1) study design, (2) length of follow-up, (3) type of intervention, (4) type of implementation strategy, (5) whether a behavioural or implementation theory was used to guide study, (6) baseline CKD severity, (7) patient minority status, (8) study location and (9) academic setting or not.

Ethics and dissemination Approval by research ethics board is not required since the review will only include published and publicly accessible data. Review findings will inform a future trial of an intervention to promote uptake of CKD diagnosis and treatment guidelines in our primary care setting and the development of complementary tools to support its successful adoption and implementation. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and develop accessible summaries of the results.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42018102441.

  • chronic kidney disease
  • guideline implementation
  • implementation strategies
  • primary care practitioner interventions
  • systematic review protocol

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors CCK and BT are the guarantors of the review. CCK conceptualised, designed and coordinated the study and created the initial draft and final manuscript. BT contributed to conceptualisation and design of the study, helped revise the manuscript and provided final approval. CCD and MAL helped in the design of the study, helped revise the manuscript and provided final approval. NDS and MHM provided guidance in conceptualising and designing the study, revised the final draft and provided final approval. PJE was instrumental in the literature search strategy, helped with design of the study and provided final approval. JM, ME, RGM, MA, AP and AV helped in various stages of conceptualising and designing the study, contributed towards the revision of the manuscript and provided final approval.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.