Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Development of a peer-led, network mapping intervention to improve the health of individuals with severe mental illnesses: protocol for a pilot study
  1. Jennifer Rose Deborah Collom1,
  2. Jonathan Davidson2,
  3. Daryl Sweet3,
  4. Steve Gillard4,
  5. Vanessa Pinfold3,
  6. Claire Henderson5,6
  1. 1 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
  2. 2 Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
  3. 3 McPin Foundation, London, UK
  4. 4 Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George’s University of London, London, UK
  5. 5 King’s College London, London, UK
  6. 6 South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Jennifer Rose Deborah Collom; jennifer.collom{at}kcl.ac.uk

Abstract

Introduction Adults with severe mental illness (SMI) have reduced life expectancy and many have comorbid physical health conditions. Primary care providers are experiencing increased demands for care for people with SMI. Barriers to accessing physical healthcare have been identified which negatively affect quality of care. We propose that peer support workers (PSWs) could deliver an intervention to service users to promote their physical health by drawing on existing social support. The aim of this research was to pilot a novel PSW-led intervention, including personal well-being network mapping, to improve access to primary care for physical health needs.

Methods and analysis Twenty-four participants will be recruited from community-based mental health teams in two boroughs of London. Each participant will be offered a six-session intervention. Quantitative data will be collected before and after intervention (at 4-month follow-up). Qualitative interviews will be conducted with PSWs after completion of the intervention and with participants at a 4-month follow-up. Some intervention sessions will be observed by a member of the research team. This is a pilot study with a small sample aiming to assess acceptability and feasibility of an intervention. We aim to use the results to refine the existing theory of change and to optimise the intervention and its evaluation in a future randomised controlled trial. This study is strengthened by its potential clinical importance and origin in previous research where service users engaged with well-being network mapping.

Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the London-Chelsea Regional Ethics Committee (ref: 17/LO/0585). The findings will be disseminated to participants, the National Health Service trusts that we recruited from, primary care mental health leads, commissioners and in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.

  • physical health
  • peer support
  • well-being network mapping
  • intervention
  • pilot
  • protocol

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors JRDC was the research assistant responsible for recruitment of participants to the study, data collection and peer supervision. JD was the research assistant responsible for helping develop the intervention, train the peer support workers and recruited participants to the study. CH was the chief investigator. DS and VP helped to develop the intervention. DS helped to train the peers. SG was the site lead and helped to train peers. JRDC drafted the paper and all authors provided edits and comments for its revision.

  • Funding This research was supported by the Maudsley Charity and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London (NIHR CLAHR South London) at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed in this article are of those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.