Article Text

Download PDFPDF

How do doctors experience the interactions among professional fulfilment, organisational factors and quality of patient care? A qualitative study in a Norwegian hospital
  1. Fredrik Baathe1,2,3,4,
  2. Judith Rosta1,
  3. Berit Bringedal1,
  4. Karin Isaksson Rø1,5
  1. 1 LEFO – Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway
  2. 2 Institute of Stress Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden
  3. 3 Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
  4. 4 Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
  5. 5 Dept. of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, MedicalFaculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  1. Correspondence to Dr Fredrik Baathe; fredrik.baathe{at}vgregion.se

Abstract

Objectives Doctors increasingly experience high levels of burnout and loss of engagement. To address this, there is a need to better understand doctors’ work situation. This study explores how doctors experience the interactions among professional fulfilment, organisational factors and quality of patient care.

Design An exploratory qualitative study design with semistructured individual interviews was chosen. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed by a transdisciplinary research group.

Setting The study focused on a surgical department of a mid-sized hospital in Norway.

Participants Seven doctors were interviewed. A purposeful sampling was used with gender and seniority as selection criteria. Three senior doctors (two female, one male) and four in training (three male, one female) were interviewed.

Results We found that in order to provide quality care to the patients, individual doctors described ‘stretching themselves’, that is, handling the tensions between quantity and quality, to overcome organisational shortcomings. Experiencing a workplace emphasis on production numbers and budget concerns led to feelings of estrangement among the doctors. Participants reported a shift from serving as trustworthy, autonomous professionals to becoming production workers, where professional identity was threatened. They felt less aligned with workplace values, in addition to experiencing limited management recognition for quality of patient care. Management initiatives to include doctors in development of organisational policies, processes and systems were sparse.

Conclusion The interviewed doctors described their struggle to balance the inherent tension among professional fulfilment, organisational factors and quality of patient care in their everyday work. They communicated how ‘stretching themselves’, to overcome organisational shortcomings, is no longer a feasible strategy without compromising both professional fulfilment and quality of patient care. Managers need to ensure that doctors are involved when developing organisational policies, processes and systems. This is likely to be beneficial for both professional fulfilment and quality of patient care.

  • ethics (see medical ethics)
  • preventive medicine
  • qualitative research

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All four authors meet the conditions outlined in the ICMJE recommendations and have all contributed in all dimensions. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content. Final approval of the version published. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. There is no one who fulfils the criteria that has been excluded as an author.

  • Funding This work was supported by Den norske legeforeningens fond for kvalitetsforbedring og pasientsikkerhet (Norwegian Fund for Quality Improvements and Patient Safety) grant number 16/5234. We confirm researcher independence from the funders and that all authors had full access to all data in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data, the accuracy of the data analysis, results and conclusions.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Interview transcripts are the empirical source. These are only for the assigned research group in order to honour the commitment with interviewed physicians.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.