Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Contributing factors that influence medication errors in the prehospital paramedic environment: a mixed-method systematic review protocol
  1. Dennis Walker1,
  2. Clint Moloney2,
  3. Brendan SueSee3,
  4. Renee Sharples4
  1. 1 School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
  3. 3 School of Linguistics, Adult and Special Education, University of Southern Queensland—Springfield Campus, Springfield, Queensland, Australia
  4. 4 College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Mr Dennis Walker; Dennis.Walker{at}usq.edu.au

Abstract

Introduction There is limited reliable research available on medication errors in relation to paramedic practice, with most evidence-based medication safety guidelines based on research in nursing, operating theatre and pharmacy settings. While similarities exist, evidence suggests that the prehospital environment is distinctly different in many aspects. The prevention of errors requires attention to factors from the organisational and regulatory level down to specific tasks and patient characteristics. The evidence available suggests errors may occur in up to 12.76% of medication administrations in some prehospital settings. With multiple sources stating that the errors are under-reported, this represents significant potential for patient harm. This review will seek to identify the factors influencing the occurrence of medication errors by paramedics in the prehospital environment.

Methods and analysis The review will include qualitative and quantitative studies involving interventions or phenomena regarding medication errors or medication safety relating to paramedics (including emergency medical technicians and other prehospital care providers) within the prehospital environment. A search will be conducted using MEDLINE (Ovid), EBSCOhost Megafile Search, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors trial registry, Google Scholar and the OpenGrey database to identify studies meeting this inclusion criteria, with initial searches commencing 30 September 2019. Studies selected will undergo assessment of methodological quality, with data to be extracted from all studies irrespective of quality. Each stage of study selection, appraisal and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers, with a third reviewer deciding any unresolved conflicts. The review will follow a convergent integrated approach, conducting a single qualitative synthesis of qualitative and ‘qualitised’ quantitative data.

Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval was required for this review. Findings from this systematic review will be disseminated via publications, reports and conference presentations.

  • Medication error
  • Medication safety
  • Pre-hospital
  • Paramedic

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors DW was responsible for the design of the review and protocol, supported by CM and BS as research supervisors. All authors (DW, CM, BS and RS) have contributed to the development and editing of the protocol.

  • Funding The corresponding author has received support from the University of Southern Queensland as a PhD student.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval There is no ethical approval required for this review.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.