Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Is fascia iliaca compartment block administered by paramedics for suspected hip fracture acceptable to patients? A qualitative study
  1. Bridie Angela Evans1,
  2. Alan Brown2,
  3. Greg Fegan1,
  4. Simon Ford3,
  5. Katy Guy3,
  6. Jenna Jones1,
  7. Sian Jones2,
  8. Leigh Keen4,
  9. Ashrafunnesa Khanom1,
  10. Mirella Longo5,
  11. Ian Pallister3,
  12. Nigel Rees4,
  13. Ian T Russell1,
  14. Anne C Seagrove1,
  15. Alan Watkins1,
  16. Helen Snooks1
  1. 1Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
  2. 2Public contributor c/o Swansea University, Swansea, UK
  3. 3Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board, Port Talbot, UK
  4. 4Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, Swansea, UK
  5. 5Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Bridie Angela Evans; b.a.evans{at}swansea.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To explore patients’ experience of receiving pain relief injection for suspected hip fracture from paramedics at the location of the injury.

Design Qualitative interviews within a feasibility trial about an alternative to routine prehospital pain management for patients with suspected hip fracture.

Setting Patients treated by paramedics in the catchment area of one emergency department in South Wales.

Participants Six patients and one carer of a patient who received fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB).

Intervention FICB administered to patients with suspected hip fracture by trained paramedics. We randomly allocated eligible patients to FICB—a local anaesthetic injection directly into the hip region—or usual care—most commonly morphine—using audited scratch cards.

Outcomes Acceptability and experience of receiving FICB, assessed through interview data. We audio-recorded, with participants’ consent, and conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts. The analysis team comprised two researchers, one paramedic and one lay member.

Results Patients had little or no memory of being offered, consenting to or receiving FICB. They recalled the reassuring manner and high quality of care received. They accepted FICB without question. Partial or confused memory characterised experience of subsequent hospital care until surgery. They said their priorities when calling for emergency help were to receive effective care. After hospital treatment, they wanted to regain their health and mobility and resume the quality of life they experienced before their injury.

Conclusions This study did not raise any concerns about the acceptability of FICB administered at the scene of injury by paramedics to people with suspected hip fracture. It adds to existing evidence about patient and carer experience of on-scene care for people with suspected hip fracture. Further research is needed to assess safety, effectiveness and cost effectiveness of this health technology in a new setting.

Trial registration number ISRCTN60065373.

  • hip fracture
  • fractured neck of femur
  • pain
  • prehospital
  • analgesia
  • anaesthetic
  • fascia iliaca compartment block
  • patient experience
  • patient acceptability

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors BAE drafted the manuscript with editorial input from all authors—AB, JJ, GF, SF, KG, SJ, LK, AK, ML, IP, NR, ACS, ITR, AW, HS. BAE led qualitative analysis with JJ, SJ and LK. The research idea was conceived and developed by NR, IP and SF, with methodological advice from GF, HS and ITR. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding Health and Care Research Wales, part of the Welsh Government, funded RAPID through their Research for Patient and Public Benefit (RfPPB) stream (1003).

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval We gained ethical approval from the Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 (reference 15/WA/0439). All respondents gave informed consent in writing to participate in this study.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article.