Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effect of psychosocial work factors on the risk of certified absences from work for a diagnosed mental health problem: a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
  1. Caroline S Duchaine1,2,
  2. Mahee Gilbert-Ouimet1,
  3. Karine Aubé1,
  4. Michel Vezina3,
  5. Ruth Ndjaboue1,
  6. Xavier Trudel1,2,
  7. Alain Lesage4,
  8. Lynne Moore2,
  9. Danielle Laurin1,5,
  10. Chantal Brisson1,2
  1. 1 Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Unit, CHU de Québec Research Center, Quebec, Canada
  2. 2 Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
  3. 3 Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, Canada
  4. 4 Department of Psychiatry, Montréal Université, Montréal, Canada
  5. 5 Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Caroline S Duchaine; caroline.duchaine{at}crchudequebec.ulaval.ca

Abstract

Introduction Mental health problems (MHPs) are frequent and disabling and are the first or second leading cause of certified sickness absences from work in industrialised countries. They are generally long lasting and generate a considerable human and socioeconomic burden. The deleterious effect of adverse psychosocial work factors on MHP has been documented. However, the evidence regarding the effect of these factors on absences from work for an MHP has not been synthesised since 2007. The proposed systematic review aims to synthesise the effect of adverse psychosocial work factors from three validated theoretical models (the demand–control–support, effort–reward–imbalance and organisational justice models) on the risk of certified absences from work for diagnosed MHP among workers.

Method and analysis A systematic search strategy will be conducted in seven databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Sociological abstracts and IBSS. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations, a multistep screening process by independent reviewers will lead to study selection. The search strategy was first run in 16 January 2017 and will be updated in October 2018. Only quantitative, prospective studies evaluating the effect of at least one psychosocial work factor from the validated theoretical models on certified absence from work for a diagnosed MHP will be considered for inclusion. Extracted data will be used for quantitative and qualitative evidence synthesis as well as to assess risk of bias and methodological quality. Meta-estimates will be provided for high-quality studies and by each psychosocial work factor, after considering homogeneity and number of studies.

Ethics and dissemination As this study will be based only on published studies, ethics approval is not required. Given that psychosocial works factors are frequent and modifiable, the results of this systematic review may provide evidence to support prevention strategies that can help to reduce the human social and economic burden associated with medically certified absences from work for an MHP.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42018091632.

  • mental health
  • sickness absence
  • sick leave
  • psychosocial work factors
  • work stress
  • depression

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors CB is the principal investigator of the study. With the close contribution of MG-O, she planned and designed this study protocol and revised the first draft. CSD wrote the first draft of the manuscript. KA contributed to the first draft of the manuscript and revised the final version. CB, XT, MG-O, RN and MV bring expertise in the definition of psychosocial work factors. MV prepared the dissemination plan. MG-O brings expertise in gender differences. AL and RN bring expertise in the definition of mental health problems and economic statistics. LM brings expertise in the design of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. DL supervised the writing of the manuscript and brings expertise in systematic reviews. All the authors revised and approved the final version of this manuscript.

  • Funding This protocol was supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR grant number#201404KRS-329015-KRS-CFBA-35698).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval As this study will be based only on published studies, ethics approval is not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; peer reviewed for ethical and funding approval prior to submission.