Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Developing and validating a novel multisource comorbidity score from administrative data: a large population-based cohort study from Italy
  1. Giovanni Corrao1,2,
  2. Federico Rea1,2,
  3. Mirko Di Martino3,
  4. Rossana De Palma4,
  5. Salvatore Scondotto1,5,
  6. Danilo Fusco3,
  7. Adele Lallo3,
  8. Laura Maria Beatrice Belotti4,
  9. Mauro Ferrante6,
  10. Sebastiano Pollina Addario1,5,
  11. Luca Merlino1,7,
  12. Giuseppe Mancia8,
  13. Flavia Carle1,9
  1. 1National Centre for Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, at the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
  2. 2Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
  3. 3Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
  4. 4Authority for Healthcare and Welfare, Emilia-Romagna Regional Health Service, Bologna, Italy
  5. 5Epidemiologic Observatory, Sicily Regional Health Service, Palermo, Italy
  6. 6Department of Culture and Society, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
  7. 7Epidemiologic Observatory, Lombardy Regional Health Service, Milan, Italy
  8. 8University of Milano-Bicocca, (Emeritus Professor), Milan, Italy
  9. 9Center of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Professor Giovanni Corrao; giovanni.corrao{at}unimib.it

Abstract

Objective To develop and validate a novel comorbidity score (multisource comorbidity score (MCS)) predictive of mortality, hospital admissions and healthcare costs using multiple source information from the administrative Italian National Health System (NHS) databases.

Methods An index of 34 variables (measured from inpatient diagnoses and outpatient drug prescriptions within 2 years before baseline) independently predicting 1-year mortality in a sample of 500 000 individuals aged 50 years or older randomly selected from the NHS beneficiaries of the Italian region of Lombardy (training set) was developed. The corresponding weights were assigned from the regression coefficients of a Weibull survival model. MCS performance was evaluated by using an internal (ie, another sample of 500 000 NHS beneficiaries from Lombardy) and three external (each consisting of 500 000 NHS beneficiaries from Emilia-Romagna, Lazio and Sicily) validation sets. Discriminant power and net reclassification improvement were used to compare MCS performance with that of other comorbidity scores. MCS ability to predict secondary health outcomes (ie, hospital admissions and costs) was also investigated.

Results Primary and secondary outcomes progressively increased with increasing MCS value. MCS improved the net 1-year mortality reclassification from 27% (with respect to the Chronic Disease Score) to 69% (with respect to the Elixhauser Index). MCS discrimination performance was similar in the four regions of Italy we tested, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (95% CI) being 0.78 (0.77 to 0.79) in Lombardy, 0.78 (0.77 to 0.79) in Emilia-Romagna, 0.77 (0.76 to 0.78) in Lazio and 0.78 (0.77 to 0.79) in Sicily.

Conclusion MCS seems better than conventional scores for predicting health outcomes, at least in the general population from Italy. This may offer an improved tool for risk adjustment, policy planning and identifying patients in need of a focused treatment approach in the everyday medical practice.

  • administrative database
  • comorbidity
  • prognostic score
  • record linkage

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors GC and FC conceived the idea for this manuscript. GC designed the study and drafted the manuscript. FR, MDM, AL, LMBB, MF and SPA performed the data analysis. RDP, SS, DF and LM extracted the data and authorised their utilisation. GM assisted in interpreting the results under clinical prospective. All authors assisted the results interpretation and manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Funding This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of the Education, University and Research (‘Fondo d’Ateneo per la Ricerca’ portion, year 2015), grant number 2015-ATE-0524.

  • Disclaimer The Italian Ministry of the Education, University and Research had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the decision to approve publication of the finished manuscript.

  • Competing interests GC received research support from the European Community (EC), the Italian Agency of Drug (AIFA) and the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR). GC took part in a variety of projects that were funded by pharmaceutical companies (ie, Novartis, GSK, Roche, AMGEN, BMS). GC also received honoraria as member of Advisory Board from Roche.

  • Ethics approval The Ethical Committee of the University of Milano-Bicocca approved the study.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.