Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Impact of clinical trial findings on Bell's palsy management in general practice in the UK 2001–2012: interrupted time series regression analysis
  1. Daniel R Morales1,
  2. Peter T Donnan2,
  3. Fergus Daly1,
  4. Tjeerd Van Staa3,4,5,
  5. Frank M Sullivan1
  1. 1Division of Population Health Sciences, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
  2. 2Dundee Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Population Health Sciences, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
  3. 3Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
  4. 4Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  5. 5London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Daniel R Morales; d.r.z.morales{at}dundee.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives To measure the incidence of Bell's palsy and determine the impact of clinical trial findings on Bell's palsy management in the UK.

Design Interrupted time series regression analysis and incidence measures.

Setting General practices in the UK contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

Participants Patients ≥16 years with a diagnosis of Bell's palsy between 2001 and 2012.

Interventions (1) Publication of the 2004 Cochrane reviews of clinical trials on corticosteroids and antivirals for Bell's palsy, which made no clear recommendation on their use and (2) publication of the 2007 Scottish Bell's Palsy Study (SBPS), which made a clear recommendation that treatment with prednisolone alone improves chances for complete recovery.

Main outcome measures Incidence of Bell's palsy per 100 000 person-years. Changes in the management of Bell's palsy with either prednisolone therapy, antiviral therapy, combination therapy (prednisolone with antiviral therapy) or untreated cases.

Results During the 12-year period, 14 460 cases of Bell's palsy were identified with an overall incidence of 37.7/100 000 person-years. The 2004 Cochrane reviews were associated with immediate falls in prednisolone therapy (−6.3% (−11.0 to −1.6)), rising trends in combination therapy (1.1% per quarter (0.5 to 1.7)) and falling trends for untreated cases (−0.8% per quarter (−1.4 to −0.3)). SBPS was associated with immediate increases in prednisolone therapy (5.1% (0.9 to 9.3)) and rising trends in prednisolone therapy (0.7% per quarter (0.4 to 1.2)); falling trends in combination therapy (−1.7% per quarter (−2.2 to −1.3)); and rising trends for untreated cases (1.2% per quarter (0.8 to 1.6)). Despite improvements, 44% still remain untreated.

Conclusions SBPS was clearly associated with change in management, but a significant proportion of patients failed to receive effective treatment, which cannot be fully explained. Clarity and uncertainty in clinical trial recommendations may change clinical practice. However, better ways are needed to understand and circumvent barriers in implementing clinical trial findings.

  • Epidemiology
  • Primary Care
  • Clinical trials < Therapeutics

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.