Article Text

The orthopaedic error index: development and application of a novel national indicator for assessing the relative safety of hospital care using a cross-sectional approach
  1. Sukhmeet S Panesar1,2,
  2. Gopalakrishnan Netuveli3,
  3. Andrew Carson-Stevens4,
  4. Sundas Javad5,
  5. Bhavesh Patel6,
  6. Gareth Parry7,8,
  7. Liam J Donaldson9,
  8. Aziz Sheikh2
  1. 1Department of Public Health, London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames, Richmond, UK
  2. 2Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  3. 3Institute for Health and Human Development, University of East London, London, UK
  4. 4Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Cardiff, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
  5. 5Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
  6. 6Care Quality Commission, London, UK
  7. 7Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  8. 8Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  9. 9Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
  10. 10Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sukhmeet S Panesar; sukhmeet.panesar{at}surgicalmatrix.com

Abstract

Objective The Orthopaedic Error Index for hospitals aims to provide the first national assessment of the relative safety of provision of orthopaedic surgery.

Design Cross-sectional study (retrospective analysis of records in a database).

Setting The National Reporting and Learning System is the largest national repository of patient-safety incidents in the world with over eight million error reports. It offers a unique opportunity to develop novel approaches to enhancing patient safety, including investigating the relative safety of different healthcare providers and specialties.

Participants We extracted all orthopaedic error reports from the system over 1 year (2009–2010).

Outcome measures The Orthopaedic Error Index was calculated as a sum of the error propensity and severity. All relevant hospitals offering orthopaedic surgery in England were then ranked by this metric to identify possible outliers that warrant further attention.

Results 155 hospitals reported 48 971 orthopaedic-related patient-safety incidents. The mean Orthopaedic Error Index was 7.09/year (SD 2.72); five hospitals were identified as outliers. Three of these units were specialist tertiary hospitals carrying out complex surgery; the remaining two outlier hospitals had unusually high Orthopaedic Error Indexes: mean 14.46 (SD 0.29) and 15.29 (SD 0.51), respectively.

Conclusions The Orthopaedic Error Index has enabled identification of hospitals that may be putting patients at disproportionate risk of orthopaedic-related iatrogenic harm and which therefore warrant further investigation. It provides the prototype of a summary index of harm to enable surveillance of unsafe care over time across institutions. Further validation and scrutiny of the method will be required to assess its potential to be extended to other hospital specialties in the UK and also internationally to other health systems that have comparable national databases of patient-safety incidents.

  • ORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERY
  • PUBLIC HEALTH

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement: