Article Text

Psychosocial risk factors, job characteristics and self-reported health in the Paris Military Hospital Group (PMHG): a cross-sectional study
  1. Jean-François Ferrand1,
  2. Catherine Verret2,
  3. Julie Trichereau2,
  4. Jean-Philippe Rondier3,
  5. Patrice Viance4,
  6. René Migliani2
  1. 1HIA Bégin, Centre de Médecine de Prévention des Armées, Saint-Mandé, France
  2. 2Centre d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique des Armées, HIA Bégin, Saint-Mandé, France
  3. 3Département de Psychiatrie, HIA Percy, Clamart, France
  4. 4Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées, Vincennes, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jean-François Ferrand; ferrand.jeff{at}wanadoo.fr

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the associations between psychosocial risk factors and self-reported health, taking into account other occupational risk factors.

Design Cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire.

Setting The three military hospitals in Paris, France.

Participants Surveys were distributed to 3173 employees (1807 military and 1336 civilian), a total of 1728 employees completed surveys. Missing data prohibited the use of 26 surveys.

Primary and secondary outcome measures The authors used Karasek's model in order to identify psychosocial factors (psychological demands, decisional latitude, social support) in the workplace. The health indicator studied was self-reported health. Adjustments were made for covariates: age, gender, civil or military status, work injury, ergonomic score, physical and chemical exposures, and occupational profile. Occupational profile was defined by professional category, department, work schedule, supervisor status and service-related length in the hospital.

Results Job strain (defined as high psychological demands and low decisional latitude) (adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.8, p<0.001) and iso-strain (job strain with low social support) were significantly associated with moderate or poor self-reported health. Among covariates, occupational profile (p<0.001) and an unsatisfactory ergonomic score (adjusted OR 2.3 95% CI 1.6 to 3.2, p<0.001) were also significantly associated with moderate or poor self-reported health.

Conclusions The results support findings linking moderate or poor self-reported health to psychosocial risk factors. The results of this study suggest that workplace interventions that aim to reduce exposure to psychological demands as well as to increase decisional latitude and social support could help improve self-reported health.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Footnotes

  • To cite: Ferrand J-F, Verret C, Trichereau J, et al. Psychosocial risk factors, job characteristics and self-reported health in the Paris Military Hospital Group (PMHG): a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000999. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000999

  • Contributors J-FF, the main researcher, was involved in all phases of the study, including study design, literature search, conduct of the study, data analysis and final article write up. CV was involved in the interpretation of data and in the elaboration of the article, she supervised the study and reviewed the manuscript. JT performed statistical analysis and revised critically the paper for important intellectual content. J-PR was involved in the design of the study and in the drafting of the article. PV and RM were involved in study conception and in the acquisition of data, and they revised critically the manuscript for important intellectual content. All the authors gave the final approval of the version to be published.

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved under the guidelines for epidemiological studies by CESPA and by PMHG Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement There are no additional data available.