Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Protocol
Effectiveness of robotic-assisted therapy for upper extremity function in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review protocol
  1. Sasithorn Sung-U1,2,
  2. Badur Un Nisa1,
  3. Kayano Yotsumoto1,
  4. Rumi Tanemura1
  1. 1Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
  2. 2Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Mueang Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  1. Correspondence to Sasithorn Sung-U; sasithornsungu{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction The application of advanced technologies in paediatric rehabilitation to improve performance and enhance everyday functioning shows considerable promise. The aims of this systematic review are to investigate the effectiveness of robotic-assisted therapy for upper extremity function in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy and to extend the scope of intervention from empirical evidence.

Methods and analysis Multiple databases, including MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and IEEE Xplore, will be comprehensively searched for relevant randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies. The grey literature will be accessed on the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database, and a hand search from reference lists of previous articles will be performed. The papers written in English language will be considered, with no limitation on publication date. Two independent reviewers will identify eligible studies, evaluate the level of evidence (the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine) and appraise methodological quality and risk of bias (the Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields (QualSyst tool); the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Data will be appropriately extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. A narrative synthesis will be provided to summarise the results, and a meta-analysis will be conducted if there is sufficient homogeneity across outcomes.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42020205818.

Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this study. The findings will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed journal and international conferences.

  • rehabilitation medicine
  • developmental neurology & neurodisability
  • protocols & guidelines
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors SS-U coordinated the study. SS-U and RT initiated the conception and designed the study of systematic review protocol. SS-U and BUN developed the search strategy. RT and KY provided instruction on important intellectual contributions. All authors read, provided feedback and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct or reporting or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.