Article Text

Protocol
Effect of interventions based on educational technologies on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections in incarcerated women: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
  1. Isaiane da Silva Carvalho1,
  2. Ryanne Carolynne Marques Gomes Mendes1,
  3. Priscila de Oliveira Cabral Melo1,
  4. Caroline Ferraz Simões2,
  5. Luciana Pedrosa Leal1,
  6. Tatiane Gomes Guedes1,
  7. Gabriela Isabel Reyes Ormeno3,
  8. Francisca Márcia Pereira Linhares1
  1. 1Nursing Postgraduate Program, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
  2. 2Physical Education Postgraduate Program, State University of Maringá, Maringa, Brazil
  3. 3Department of Education, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
  1. Correspondence to Dr Isaiane da Silva Carvalho; isaianekarvalho{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Introduction Prisons are places with high vulnerability and high risk for the development of sexually transmitted infections. World Health Agencies recommend establishing intervention measures, such as information and education, on the prevention of diseases. Thus, technologies as tools for health education have been used to reduce sexually transmitted infections. However, no systematic review has investigated the effectiveness of these interventions. Therefore, this review’s objective is to examine the effect of educational technologies used for preventing sexually transmitted infections in incarcerated women.

Methods and analysis Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be strictly followed. The following electronic databases will be searched: Scopus; Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, Education Resources Information Center, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Randomised clinical trials of interventions that used educational technologies to prevent sexually transmitted infections in incarcerated women will be searched in the databases from the beginning of 2020 until December by two researchers independently. A narrative synthesis will be constructed for all included studies, and if there are sufficient data, a meta-analysis will be performed using the Review Manager software (V.5.3). Continuous results will be presented as the weighted mean difference or the standardised mean difference with 95% CIs. Under the heterogeneity of the included studies, a random-effects or fixed-effects model will be used. The studies’ heterogeneity will be assessed by the I2 method. The sensitivity analysis will be carried out to examine the magnitude of each study’s influence on the general results. A significance level of p≤0.05 will be adopted.

Ethics and disclosure Ethical approval is not required because no primary data will be collected. The results will be published in journals reviewed by peers.

PROSPERO registration number CRD42020163820.

  • public health
  • primary care
  • infectious diseases
  • sexual medicine
  • education & training (see medical education & training)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Contributors IdSC—definition of PICO question, writing the protocol and the present manuscript and coordination of the protocol development. RCMGM—outcome definition and review of protocol and manuscript. PdOCM—outcome definition and review of protocol and manuscript. CFS—outcome definition and review of protocol and manuscript. LPL—definition of PICO question, outcome definition and review of protocol and manuscript. TGG—outcome definition and review of protocol and manuscript. GIRO—definition of PICO question, outcome definition and review of protocol and manuscript. FMPL—definition of PICO question, outcome definition and review of protocol and manuscript, and coordination of the protocol development.

  • Funding This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.